期刊文献+

梨属叶绿体非编码区trnL-trnF和accD-psaI特征及其在系统发育研究中的应用价值 被引量:18

Characterization and Phylogenetic Utility of Non-coding Chloroplast Regions trnL-trnF and accD-psaI in Pyrus
原文传递
导出
摘要 对梨属19个种共26个供试样本及两个苹果属外类群样本的叶绿体非编码区trnL-trnF和accD-psaI进行了序列分析。排列后的序列长度分别为927 bp和944 bp。两个区域组合后共有36个核苷酸替换(substitution)和11个插入/缺失(indel)。将所有indel处理为一次变异事件并编码为替换,用于简约法系统树和NeighborNet系统发育网络(phylogenetic networks)的构建。研究结果表明:indel为系统发育分析提供了可靠的信息;相比trnL-trnF,accD-psaI因进化速率较快,更适合应用于种及种以下分类水平的梨属植物系统关系研究;NeighborNet系统发育网络表明系统树上部分较低的分支支持率由冲突的信息引起,其余则由信息位点不足引起。此外结果还揭示了可疑种间杂交种的母系祖先。 The two non-coding chloroplast regions,trnL-trnF and accD-psaI of 26 accessions from 19 Pyrus L.species and two outgroup accessions from Malus Mill.were sequenced.Aligned lengths of these two regions were 927 bp and 944 bp,respectively.A total of 36 substitutions and 11 indels were obtained in the combined data.All of the indels were treated as single mutation events and coded as substitutions manually when conducting maximum parsimony and Neighbor Ne(t NN)analyses.Our results showed that the indels in these two cpDNA regions were reliable phylogenetic characters and increased phylogenetic resolution;Compared with trnL-trnF,accD-psaI evolves quicker,providing more information for the discovery of inter-and intra-specific relationships in Pyrus.The NN split network indicated that the poor resolution in the phylogenetic tree was partly caused by conflicting signals or by lack of sufficient informative site.In addition,maternal lineages of putative inter-specific hybrids were revealed.
机构地区 浙江大学园艺系
出处 《园艺学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第12期2261-2272,共12页 Acta Horticulturae Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30871690)
关键词 梨属 TRNL-TRNF accD-psaI 长度突变 系统关系 Pyrus trnL-trnF accD-psaI indel phylogenetic relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Aldasoro J J, Aedo C, Garmendia F M. 1996. The genus Pyrus L. (Rosaceae) in south-west Europe and North Africa. Botanical Journal of the LinneanSociety, 121: 143-158. 被引量:1
  • 2Bailey L. 1917. Pyrus, standard cyclopedia of horticulture. New York, USA. Macmillan, 5:2865 - 2878. 被引量:1
  • 3Bao Lu, Chen Kun-song, Zhang Dong, Cao Yu-fen, Yamamoto T, Teng Yuan-wen. 200% Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54: 959 - 971. 被引量:1
  • 4Bao Lu, Chen Kun-song, Zhang Dong, Li Xiu-gen, Tang Yuan-wen. 2008. An assessment of genetic variability and relationships within Asian pears based on AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers. Scientia Horticulturae, 116:374 - 380. 被引量:1
  • 5Barkman T, Simpson B. 2002. Hybrid origin and parentage of Dendrochilum acuiferum (Orchidaceae) inferred in a phylogenetic context using nuclear and plastid DNA sequence data. Systematic Botany, 27:209 - 220. 被引量:1
  • 6Borsch T, Quandt D. 2009. Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 282: 169 - 199. 被引量:1
  • 7Caicedo A L, Schaal B A. 2004. Population structure and phylogeography of Solanum pimpinellifolium inferred from a nuclear gene. Molecular Ecology, 13: 1871- 1882. 被引量:1
  • 8Challice J S, Westwood M N. 1973. Numerical taxonomic studies of the genus Pyrus using both chemical and botanical characters. Botanical Journal of the Lirmean Society, 67:121 - 148. 被引量:1
  • 9Clegg M T, Gaut B S, Leam G H, Morton B R. 1994. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91:6795 - 6801. 被引量:1
  • 10Dolatowski J, Nowosielski J, Podyma W, Szymanska M, Zych M. 2004. Molecular studies on the variability of Polish semi-wild pears (Pyrus) using AFLP. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 12: 331 - 337. 被引量:1

共引文献23

同被引文献172

引证文献18

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部