期刊文献+

直肠癌3.0T磁共振弥散加权成像及其与病理的相关性研究 被引量:10

3.0T MR diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer diagnosing and researching with pathology
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0T磁共振背景抑制弥散加权成像(diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression,DWIBS)对直肠癌的诊断价值,并分析其肿瘤表观弥散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)值与病理的相关关系。方法收集42例直肠癌患者术前盆腔常规MRI及DWI的扫描资料,所有患者均接受直肠癌切除并病理组织学检查。测量肿瘤及正常直肠肠壁的ADC值并进行统计学分析。结果 (1)直肠癌组与对照组的ADC值分别为(0.76±0.11)×10-3mm2/s和(1.22±0.16)×10-3mm2/s,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。鉴别直肠癌与正常直肠肠壁的ADC值的最佳分界值为0.96×10-3mm2/s,敏感性为95.2%,特异性为97.6%。(2)1例高分化,33例中分化及5例低分化直肠腺癌的ADC值分别为0.78×10-3mm2/s,(0.75±0.12)×10-3mm2/s及(0.77±0.11)×10-3mm2/s。中分化与低分化直肠腺癌的ADC值比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 3.0T磁共振DWI能提高直肠癌的检出率,直肠癌原发灶的ADC值明显低于正常直肠肠壁的ADC值,不同分化程度的直肠腺癌的ADC值间无统计学差异。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression (DWIBS) at 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) for diagnosing rectal cancer, and analyze the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and pathological results of tumor. Methods The study included 42 patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative routine MRI + DWI examination and were treated by rectal cancer dissection, and then obtained pathological results. ADC values of tumors and normal rectal walls were measured respectively, and statistical analysis was made. Results ( 1 ) The ADC values of total 42 patients of rectal primary tumors and normal rectal wall were (0.76± 0.11) × 10-3 mmE/s and (1.22± 0.16) × 10-3 mm2/s respectively. The ADC value of rectal cancer was statistically significant different from that of the normal rectal wall tissue (t -- 15.439,P 〈 0.001 ). The optimal cutoff ADC value in differentiating rectal cancer from normal rectal wall was (0.96 × 10-3) mmE/s, representing 95.2% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity. (2) The ADC values of one case of well differentiated, 33 cases of moderately differentiated and 5 cases of poorly differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma were 0.78× 10-3 mm2/s, (0.75 ± 0.12) x 10-3 mmE/s and (0.77 ± 0.11) × 10-3romE/s, respectively. There was no statistically difference between moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated rectal adenocarcinoma in ADC value (P 〉 0.05). Conclusions 3.0T MR diffusion- weighted imaging can improve the tumor detection rate of rectal cancer. The ADC value of primary tumor is significantly lower than the normal rectal wall, and there is no statistically difference between different degrees of differentiation of rectal adenocarcinoma in ADC value.
出处 《中华普通外科学文献(电子版)》 2011年第6期55-58,共4页 Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
基金 广东省科技计划项目(2010B080701037)
关键词 肠肿瘤 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 表观弥散系数 Rectal neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献38

共引文献24

同被引文献98

  • 1张赟,梁碧玲,高立,钟镜联,叶瑞心,沈君.颈部淋巴结的MR扩散加权成像[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(3):244-247. 被引量:35
  • 2吕晓艳,刘怀军.磁共振弥散成像评价胶质瘤术前分级的应用价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2007,18(5):351-353. 被引量:3
  • 3饶圣祥,曾蒙苏,程伟中,许剑民,孙益红,纪元,陈财忠,张澍杰,李轫晨.直肠癌MR扩散加权成像的b值选取及其应用价值[J].放射学实践,2007,22(10):1013-1016. 被引量:12
  • 4Kim J, Huynh R, Abraham I, et al. Number of lymph nodes examined and its impact on colorectal cancer staging. The American Surgeon, 2006,72:902. 被引量:1
  • 5Kwok H, Bissett IP, Hill GL, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis,2009,15:9. 被引量:1
  • 6Monig SP, Baldus SE, Zirbes TK, et al. Lymph node size and meta- static infiltration in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 1999,6:579. 被引量:1
  • 7Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Vander PV, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology ,2009,251:134. 被引量:1
  • 8Roy C, Bierry G, Matau A, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging to detect small malignant pelvic lymph nodes at 3T. Eur Radiol, 2010,20 : 1803. 被引量:1
  • 9Lambregts DM, Maas M, Riedl RG, et al. Value of ADC measure- ments for nodal staging after chemoradiation in locally advanced rec- tal cancer-a per lesion validation study. Eur Radiol,2011,21:265. 被引量:1
  • 10Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F, et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology. 2001.220 : 621. 被引量:1

引证文献10

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部