摘要
阻碍效应的研究对学习机制的探讨具有重要意义。联结主义学派和认知主义学派都对阻碍效应的机制进行了系统探讨。联结主义学习理论认为阻碍效应的存在是刺激之间竞争的结果,而认知学习理论认为阻碍效应是人们理性推理的结果。文章对阻碍效应的相关理论进行了回顾,并从学习双机制角度对阻碍效应的研究方向进行了展望。
出处
《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期39-46,69,共9页
Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金
中山大学青年教师起步资助计划(18000-3181402)资助
参考文献44
-
1Aydin, A. , & Pearce, J. M. Prototype effects in categorization by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Animal Be- havior Processes, 1994, 20 : 264 -277. 被引量:1
-
2Kamin, L. J. Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In Church, R. M. & Campbell, B. A. (Eds.), Pun- ishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1969, 279 -296. 被引量:1
-
3Mackintosh, N. J. A Theory of Attention : Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement. Psychological Re- view, 1975, 82:276-298. 被引量:1
-
4Waldmann, M. R. Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000, 26 : 53 -76. 被引量:1
-
5Beckers, T. , De Houwer, J. , & Matue, H. Editorial: Human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2007, 60:289-290. 被引量:1
-
6Bott, L. , Hoffman, A. B. , & Murphy, G. L. Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gener- al, 2007, 136:685 -699. 被引量:1
-
7Aitken, M. R. F. , Larkin, M. J. W. , & Dickinson, A. Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2001, 54:27 -51. 被引量:1
-
8Le Pelley, M. E. , Oakeshott, S. M. , Wills, A. J. & McLaren, I. P. L. The outcome specificity of learned predictiveness effects: parallels between human causal learning and animal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2005, 31:226 -236. 被引量:1
-
9Beckers, T. , De Houwer, J. , Pineno, O. , & Miller, R. R. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue com- petition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, 31:238 -249. 被引量:1
-
10De Houwer J. , & Beckers T. A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2002a, 55B: 289 -310. 被引量:1
同被引文献76
-
1莫雷.知识的类型与学习过程——学习双机制理论的基本框架[J].课程.教材.教法,1998,18(5):21-25. 被引量:48
-
2Anderson, J. R. (1991a). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14,471 - 517. 被引量:1
-
3Anderson, J. R. (1991b). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98,409 - 429. 被引量:1
-
4Ashby, F. G. , Alfonso- Reese, L. A. , Turken, A. U. , & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of muhiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105,442 - 481. 被引量:1
-
5Blair, M. R. , Watson, M. R. , & Meier, K. M. (2009). Errors, effi- ciency, and the interplay between attention and category learning. Cognition, 112,330 - 336. 被引量:1
-
6Bott, L. , Hoffman, A. B. , & Murphy, G. L . (2007). Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136,685 - 699. 被引量:1
-
7Chen, L. , Bott, L. , & Mo, L. Feature learning in the absence of classi- fication error ( Under Review). Denton, S. E. , & Krusehke, J. K. (2006). Attention and salience in associative blocking. Learning & behavior, 34,285 -304. 被引量:1
-
8Erickson, M. A. , & Krusehke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107 - 140. 被引量:1
-
9Evans, J. (2008). Dual- processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59,255 - 278. 被引量:1
-
10Gluek, M. A. , & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: General, 117,227 - 247. 被引量:1
引证文献3
-
1陈琳,莫雷,郑允佳,王雨函.类别学习的阻碍效应与双机制理论[J].心理科学,2013,36(2):356-363. 被引量:4
-
2陈琳,钟罗金,郑允佳,莫雷.类别学习中的认知学习机制[J].心理与行为研究,2013,11(3):305-311. 被引量:2
-
3陈琳,钟罗金,李悠,莫雷.特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2014,12(5):577-582.
二级引证文献5
-
1陈琳,钟罗金,郑允佳,莫雷.类别学习中的认知学习机制[J].心理与行为研究,2013,11(3):305-311. 被引量:2
-
2陈琳,钟罗金,李悠,莫雷.特征呈现方式对类别知觉表征的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2014,12(5):577-582.
-
3邢强,孙海龙,车敬上.反馈方式对家族相似性类别学习的影响[J].心理学探新,2015,35(3):222-227. 被引量:1
-
4邢强,孙海龙,刘凯,夏静静.非监控类别学习的分类策略与表征[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(8):1390-1397.
-
5马超群,员学锋,任朝霞,徐和平.地理学课程混合式教学的实践和思考——以长安大学土地管理专业地理学课程为例[J].高等理科教育,2022(4):22-28. 被引量:2
-
1席梅红.论教师教学智慧的具体表现[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版),2008,21(4):65-68. 被引量:2
-
2朱瑞娜.联结主义及其对高职英语教学的启示[J].教育教学论坛,2009(11X):151-152.
-
3王群.借助表征了解知识建构过程的“教”与“学”[J].吉林省教育学院学报,2015,30(3):18-20.
-
4王佑镁,祝智庭.从联结主义到联通主义:学习理论的新取向[J].中国电化教育,2006(3):5-9. 被引量:241
-
5陈天洪.看学习理论的争鸣解读科学研究[J].当代教育科学,2008(21):10-12.
-
6谭昌旭.教师的天职[J].今日教育,2006(07S):1-1.
-
7吴雪飞.教育心理学视野下的教师专业成长研究[J].中国科教创新导刊,2009(11):250-250. 被引量:1
-
8周正怀.桑代克和斯金纳在学习理论上的分歧[J].湖南第一师范学报,2005,5(3):34-37. 被引量:9
-
9桑代克的实验[J].文学少年(中学),2012(7):28-28.
-
10孙惠惠.万变不离其理 溯源终回其宗——不同时期“加减一步计算应用问题”典型教学设计解读[J].小学教学设计(数学.科学版),2017,0(1):53-54.