期刊文献+

阻碍效应的理论研究述评 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 阻碍效应的研究对学习机制的探讨具有重要意义。联结主义学派和认知主义学派都对阻碍效应的机制进行了系统探讨。联结主义学习理论认为阻碍效应的存在是刺激之间竞争的结果,而认知学习理论认为阻碍效应是人们理性推理的结果。文章对阻碍效应的相关理论进行了回顾,并从学习双机制角度对阻碍效应的研究方向进行了展望。
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第2期39-46,69,共9页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 中山大学青年教师起步资助计划(18000-3181402)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Aydin, A. , & Pearce, J. M. Prototype effects in categorization by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Animal Be- havior Processes, 1994, 20 : 264 -277. 被引量:1
  • 2Kamin, L. J. Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In Church, R. M. & Campbell, B. A. (Eds.), Pun- ishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1969, 279 -296. 被引量:1
  • 3Mackintosh, N. J. A Theory of Attention : Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement. Psychological Re- view, 1975, 82:276-298. 被引量:1
  • 4Waldmann, M. R. Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000, 26 : 53 -76. 被引量:1
  • 5Beckers, T. , De Houwer, J. , & Matue, H. Editorial: Human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2007, 60:289-290. 被引量:1
  • 6Bott, L. , Hoffman, A. B. , & Murphy, G. L. Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Gener- al, 2007, 136:685 -699. 被引量:1
  • 7Aitken, M. R. F. , Larkin, M. J. W. , & Dickinson, A. Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2001, 54:27 -51. 被引量:1
  • 8Le Pelley, M. E. , Oakeshott, S. M. , Wills, A. J. & McLaren, I. P. L. The outcome specificity of learned predictiveness effects: parallels between human causal learning and animal conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2005, 31:226 -236. 被引量:1
  • 9Beckers, T. , De Houwer, J. , Pineno, O. , & Miller, R. R. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue com- petition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, 31:238 -249. 被引量:1
  • 10De Houwer J. , & Beckers T. A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2002a, 55B: 289 -310. 被引量:1

同被引文献76

  • 1莫雷.知识的类型与学习过程——学习双机制理论的基本框架[J].课程.教材.教法,1998,18(5):21-25. 被引量:48
  • 2Anderson, J. R. (1991a). Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14,471 - 517. 被引量:1
  • 3Anderson, J. R. (1991b). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98,409 - 429. 被引量:1
  • 4Ashby, F. G. , Alfonso- Reese, L. A. , Turken, A. U. , & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of muhiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105,442 - 481. 被引量:1
  • 5Blair, M. R. , Watson, M. R. , & Meier, K. M. (2009). Errors, effi- ciency, and the interplay between attention and category learning. Cognition, 112,330 - 336. 被引量:1
  • 6Bott, L. , Hoffman, A. B. , & Murphy, G. L . (2007). Blocking in Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136,685 - 699. 被引量:1
  • 7Chen, L. , Bott, L. , & Mo, L. Feature learning in the absence of classi- fication error ( Under Review). Denton, S. E. , & Krusehke, J. K. (2006). Attention and salience in associative blocking. Learning & behavior, 34,285 -304. 被引量:1
  • 8Erickson, M. A. , & Krusehke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107 - 140. 被引量:1
  • 9Evans, J. (2008). Dual- processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59,255 - 278. 被引量:1
  • 10Gluek, M. A. , & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology: General, 117,227 - 247. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部