摘要
目的:比较穿着鞋带跑鞋和采用松紧鞋舌跑鞋在主观舒适度、足底压力分布和后足运动参数方面的区别。方法:15名有经验的跑步者自愿参与本研究。采用一份可靠的问卷进行主观舒适度调查;采用Novel pedar足底压力测试系统记录受试者穿着两种跑鞋跑步时的足底压力分布;采用二维高速摄像系统和Ariel动作解析系统记录、分析受试者穿着两种跑鞋跑步时后足的运动图像及足跟相对小腿的内、外翻参数。结果:与穿着有鞋带跑鞋比较,受试者在穿着松紧鞋舌跑鞋跑步时的主观舒适度较差,第4和第5跖趾关节分区足底压强明显增加,后足外翻角度较大。结论:松紧鞋舌式设计并不适用于跑鞋。有鞋带跑鞋合脚性更好,可以帮助跑步者固定鞋内的脚。
Objective The purpose of this study was to examine whether there were differences in the perceived comfort,plantar pressure,and rearfoot motion between laced running shoes and elastic-covered running shoes.Methods Fifteen male amateur runners participated in the study.The perceived comfort,plantar loading,and rearfoot motion control（inversion and eversion of the heel to the shank） of each type of shoes during running were recorded.Results When the laced running shoes and elastic-covered running shoes were compared,the elastic-covered running shoes showed lower perceived comfort rating in terms of shoe length,width,heel cup fitting,and forefoot cushioning.The elastic-covered running shoes also recorded higher peak plantar pressure in the lateral side of the forefoot,as well as larger maximum rearfoot pronation.Conclusions Overall,shoelaces can help runners obtain better foot-shoe fit.Moreover,shoelaces may help prevent injury in running by better controlling the aforementioned factors.
出处
《中国运动医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第7期613-617,共5页
Chinese Journal of Sports Medicine
关键词
跑鞋
主观舒适度
足底压强
后足运动
running shoes
comfort
plantar pressure
rearfoot motion
