期刊文献+

《欧洲语言共同参考框架》对我国大学英语教育的影响研究 被引量:31

An Impact Study of the CEFR on Chinese College English Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 《欧洲语言共同参考框架》(CFER)自问世以来,对欧洲和其他地区国家语言教育政策产生了深远影响。本研究采用质性研究方法,通过采访四位直接参与我国大学英语教育政策文件《大学英语课程教学要求》制定工作的学者,探究CEFR对制定该文件产生的影响。访谈表明:CEFR从理念和文本表述上影响了《大学英语课程教学要求》,但受制于我国教育传统和社会语言环境,CEFR对我国大学英语教育实践还没有产生实质影响;教育传统、社会语言环境和教学实践三者构成了国际语言教育政策对他国产生影响的过滤器。 The CEFR has had a major impact at the level of language education policy in many countries within and beyond Europe since its inception. This study, by adopting a qualitative approach, interviewed four scholars involved in developing the Chinese English Curriculum Requirements in order to measure the impact of the CEFR on Chinese College English education. Analyses of the interviews have revealed that the CEFR has impacts on Chinese College English education in terms of conceptualization and the wording of the College English Requirements. However, the ideas transferred from the CEFR have not been fully translated into classroom practice due to the restrictions of Chinese educational tradition and sociolinguistic setting. It is concluded that the educational tradition, sociolinguistic setting as well as practitioners constitute the three filters in the process of language education policy impacts in the international context.
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 2011年第4期31-38,共8页 Foreign Languages in China
关键词 《欧洲语言共同参考框架》 大学英语教育 教育传统 社会语言环境 the CEFR College English education educational tradition sociolinguistic setting
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 2Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. Working with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in the Canadian context, http://www.emec. ea/Programs/assessment/Doeuments/CEFR- eanadian-context.pdf, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 3Glaser, B.&Strauss. A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research[M]. Chicago: Aldine, 1967. 被引量:1
  • 4Jones, N & Saville, N. European language policy: Assessment, learning, and the CEFR [J]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2009 (29): 51-63. 被引量:1
  • 5Lingard, B. &Rizvi, F. Globalizing Education Policy [M]. New York: Routledge, 2010. 被引量:1
  • 6Negishi, Masashi. How much do we have in common with the Common European Framework of Reference? The Applicability of the CEFR to an IRT-based English proficiency test in Japan [C]. In Asako Yoshitomi, Tae Umino, & Masashi NEGISHI(eds). Reading in Second Language Pedagogy and Second Language Acquisition in Japanese Context [C]. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006: 83-99. 被引量:1
  • 7Spolsky, B. Language Policy [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Spolsky, B. Handbook of Educational Linguistics [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. 被引量:1
  • 9蔡基刚著..大学英语教学 回顾、反思和研究 review, reflection and research[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2006:414.
  • 10蔡基刚.转型时期的我国大学英语教学特征和对策研究[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(1):27-32. 被引量:510

共引文献1971

同被引文献285

引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部