期刊文献+

莫西沙星注射液在老年社区获得性下呼吸道感染中的临床应用 被引量:10

Observation on Clinilcal Effects of Moxifloxacin Infusion in the Treatment of the Community-acquired Low Respiratory Tract Infections in Olders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价莫西沙星注射液治疗老年中、重度社区获得性下呼吸道感染的疗效和安全性。方法采用随机对照的方法,将64例中、重度社区获得性肺炎(CAP)和慢性支气管炎急性发作(AECB)的老年患者随机分为莫西沙星组和特治星组各32例,莫西沙星组用莫西沙星注射液0.4g,iv,Qd,特治星组用特治星4.5g,iv,Q8h,疗程均为7~14天。结果莫西沙星组痊愈22例,显效6例,总有效率90.3%。特治星组痊愈23例,显效5例,总有效率87.5%,两组比较差异无显著性(P〉0.05)。细菌清除率莫西沙星组为86.7%(13/15),特治星组为92.3%(12/13),两组之间差异无显著性(P〉0.05)。莫西沙星组不良事件发生率15.6%(5/32),仅有l例因严重头晕停药。结论莫西沙星注射液治疗老年社区获得性下呼吸道感染与特治星疗效相当,安全性较好。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Moxifloxacin infusion in the treatment of moderate and severe community acquired low respiratory tract infections in olders. Method A randomized trial was comducted ,64 patients with moderate severa CAP or AECB were randomly divided into 2 groups, the study group treated with Moxifloxacin 0. 4 g, iv, Qd for 7 - 14 d;the control group with Tazocin 4. 5 g,iv, Q8 h for 7 - 14 d. Results The total effective rate, and bacterial clearance rate of the study group were 90. 3% ,86.7% ,respectively;while the control group were 87.5% , 92. 3% ,respectively. There was no significant difference. The side effect rate caused by moxifloxacin was 15.6%, only 1 case ceased with treatment because of clizzment. Conclusion Moxifloxacin infusion is efficient and safe.
作者 陈国清
出处 《中南医学科学杂志》 CAS 2011年第3期320-323,共4页 Medical Science Journal of Central South China
关键词 社区获得性下呼吸道感染 莫西沙星注射液 community-acquired low respiratory tract infections moxifioxacin infusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献17

  • 1BALFOUR JA, LAMB HM. Moxifloxacin:a review of its clinical potential in management of community-acquired respiratory tract infection[J]. Drugs, 2000, 59(1):115-139. 被引量:1
  • 2HOEFFKEN G, MEYER HP. The efficacy and safety of two oral moxifloxacin regimens compared to oral clarithmmycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia[J]. Respir Med, 2001,95(7) :553-564. 被引量:1
  • 3American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with community acquired pneumonia [ J ] . Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 163(3) :1730-1754. 被引量:1
  • 4NIEDERMAN MS. Guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia[ J]. Med Clin North Am, 2001, 85 (5) : 1493-1509. 被引量:1
  • 5MAN I, MURPHY J, FERGUSON J. Fluoroquinolone phototoxicity :a comparison of moxifloxaein and lomefloxaein in normal volunteers [ J ]. Antimierobial Chemotherapy, 1999,43 ( Suppl B) :77-82. 被引量:1
  • 6Norrby SR, Petermann W, Willcox PA, et al. A comparative study of levofloxacin and ceftriaxone in the treatment of hospitalized patients with pneumonia[J]. Scand J Infect Dis, 1998, 30(4):397-404 被引量:1
  • 7Aamerican Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of adults with community acquired pneumonia[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2001,163:1730. 被引量:1
  • 8European Respiratory Society. Guidelines for management of adult community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections[J]. Eur Respir J,1998,11(4):986. 被引量:1
  • 9Blondeau JM, Laskowski R, Bjarnason J, et al. Comparative in vitro activity of gatifloxacin, grepagloxacin, Ievofloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin against 4151 Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms [J]. Int I Antimicrob Agents ,2000,14:450. 被引量:1
  • 10Urueta J, Ariza J, de Brito A, et al. Safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin vs levofloxacin in the treatment of AECB[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect ,2001,7(Suppl) 1:168. 被引量:1

共引文献6163

同被引文献54

引证文献10

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部