摘要
目的观察中国大陆汉语版日常注意测验(TEA)的信度、效度。方法随机选取中国正常人117人(年龄18～65岁),在蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)筛查后进行TEA、连线测验B(TMT-B)、同步序列加法任务(PASAT,2.0 s)、Stroop字色干扰任务(Stroop)、连续作业测验(CPT)。在正常组中选取20人完成TEA的A、B两个版本的检验,以进行重测信度检验。结果 A、B两个版本的相关分析结果显示:2周后两个版本的大部分子测验的相关系数较高(r>0.700,P<0.01)。因子分析提取出4个主成分,为持续性注意、选择性注意、转移性注意及分配性注意,分别涉及TEA子测验及相关实验室测验。结论 TEA有较好的信度、效度。
Objective To explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Test of Everyday Attention（TEA） in normal Chinese people.Methods 117 normal volunteers（18~65 years old） were screened with the Montreal Cognition Assessment（MoCA）,and the normal volunteers were administered to TEA（versions A）,Trail Making Test B（TMT-B）,Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task（PASAT）,Stroop Color-Word Interference Test（SCWT）,Continuous Performance Test（CPT）.20 normal volunteers were also given version B for test-ing of the test-retest reliability,time interval was 2 weeks between versions A and B.Results There was correlation between versions A and B in the major subtests（r0.700,P0.01） at a two-week interval.The varimax rotation principal-component analysis extracted 4 component factors,namely sustained attention,selective attention,switching attention,and divided attention.The factors included various subtests of TEA and the other laboratory attentional test.Conclusion TEA has good reliability and validity.
出处
《中国康复理论与实践》
CSCD
2011年第6期515-518,共4页
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基金
科技部科技支撑计划项目(2008BAH26B04
2008-2010)
首度医学发展科研基金重点支持项目(2007-2071
2008-2011)
关键词
注意
注意评定
日常注意测验
信度
效度
attention
attentional assessement
the Test of Everyday Attention
reliability
validity
