摘要
《城乡规划法》第64条作为城乡规划个案执法中适用最多的条文之一，是城乡规划主管部门追究违法建设主体法律责任的重要依据。该条在语义逻辑上以5个“分层标准”为依据层序罗列了针对不同情形的行政处理方式。但圈于“分层标准”的抽象与模糊，《城乡规划法》第64条的众多执法分歧导致了城乡规划主管部门执法的混乱，影响了执法的整体效果，成为“权力寻租”等腐败行为得以孳生的温床。因此，在理顺《城乡规划法》第64条的执行流程的基础上列举“分层标准”的具体情形、消除执法分歧、明确“分层标准”的认定程序将是《城乡规划法》第64条得以细化完善的路径选择。
Article 64 of Urban-Rural Planning Act, which is most frequently used in enforcement of city and country planning cases, is the most important standard for city and country planning administrative department to penalize illegal constructor. This article lists different ways of administrative resolution based on ＂five stratified levels＂. However, the abstract and obscure stratification directly leads to the discrepancy in understanding which makes chaos in the enforcement of planning administrative department, and creates the possibility of corruption. Therefore, clearly listing the concrete conditions to eliminate the misunderstanding in enforcement would be the possible path to improve the Article 64.
出处
《城市规划》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第5期33-37,共5页
City Planning Review
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费资助(CDJSK11012)
关键词
语义逻辑
分层标准
执法分歧
细化完善
meaning and logic
stratification standards
enforcement disputes
improvement
