期刊文献+

高层管理团队认知研究综述 被引量:3

Research Review on the Top Management Team Cognition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自1984年Hambrick和Mason提出"高层梯队理论"以来,学术界掀起了对高层管理团队研究的热潮,近来对高层管理团队认知成为学者们研究的热点并取得了大量的研究成果。通过对这些成果进行综述,探讨认知派别、共享心智模型、社会认知等认知理论对企业战略决策进而对组织绩效的影响,分析已有研究中存在的局限并提出从人力资本的视角,将高层管理团队的认知特征与人力资本的产权与积累状况联系起来,明确高层管理团队认知特征与战略决策之间的作用机制。 Since 1984,Hambrick and Mason proposed"top echelon theory",academics focused on the research of top management team,and recently top management team cognition become a hot research of scholars and made a lot of research results.By reviewing these results,this paper discussed the impact on strategic decisions of enterprises and then the organizational performance of cognition theory about cognitive factions shared mental models social cognitive,analyzed the limitations about existing studies and raise the perspective of human capital,linking between the cognitive characteristics of top management team and human capital accumulation and conditions,specific cognitive characteristics of top management team and strategic decisions mechanism.
作者 葛玉辉 陈倩
机构地区 上海理工大学
出处 《工业技术经济》 CSSCI 2011年第5期111-115,共5页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基金 上海市教委科研创新重点项目"基于人力资本的高管团队认知特征对战略一致性的作用机制研究"(项目编号:10ZS96) 上海市(第三期)管理科学与工程重点学科(项目编号:S30504)
关键词 高层管理团队 认知 战略决策 top management team cognition strategic decisions
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Hambrick DC. Upper echelons theory: an update [ J].Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32 (1): 33-54. 被引量:1
  • 2David P.Tegarden, Linda F.Tegarden and Steven D.Sheetz. Cognitive Factions in a Top Management Team: Sur- facing and Analyzing Cognitive Diversity using Causal Maps [ J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2009, 18 (6): 537- 566. 被引量:1
  • 3Amason A C. Disfinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39 (1): 123-148. 被引量:1
  • 4Jehn K A. Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value - based group conflict [J]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1994, 5:223 - 238. 被引量:1
  • 5Knight D. Pearce CL. Smith KG. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus [ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999, 85 (2): 273-283. 被引量:1
  • 6Kraiger K., L.H.Wenzel. Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared raental models as indi- cators of team effectiveness. Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications [ M ]. Lawrenee Erlbaum Associates, 1997:1 - 356. 被引量:1
  • 7Mathieu J.E, T.S.Heffner, G.F.Goodwin, E.Salas, JA Cannon- Bowers. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance [ J]. Journal of Applied Psycholo- gy, 2000, 85 (2): 273-283. 被引量:1
  • 8Cannon- Bowers J.A, E.Salas. Reflections on shared cognition [ J ]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001, 22 (2): 195-202. 被引量:1
  • 9Smith- Jentsch K.A, J.E.Mathieu, K.Kraiger. In- vestigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting [ J ]. Journal of applied psychology, 2005, 90 (3): 523- 535. 被引量:1
  • 10Dane E, Pratt, M.G. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making [ J]. Academy of Management Re- view, 2007, 32 (1): 33 - 54. 被引量:1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Parent M., Gallupe R B. et al. Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help? Information & Management, 2000, 38:47~58 被引量:1
  • 2Saunders Carlo, Miranda Sh. Information acquisition in group decision making. Information& Management, 1998,34:55~74 被引量:1
  • 3Jehn K A, Mannix E A. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44:238~251 被引量:1
  • 4Oetzel J G. Self-construals, communication processes, and group outcomes in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Small Group Research, 2001,32:19~54 被引量:1
  • 5Mohammed S, Ringseis E. Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: the role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001, 85:310~335 被引量:1
  • 6Nonaka I, Toyama R, Konno N. SECI, ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 2000, 33:5~34 被引量:1
  • 7Spector J M. System dynamics and interactive learning environments: lessons learned and implications for the future. Simulation & Gaming, 2000, 31:528~535 被引量:1
  • 8Schvaneveldt R W. Pathfinder associative networks:Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1990 被引量:1
  • 9Rutkowski A F, Smits M. Constructionist theory to explain effects of GDSS. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2001,10:67~82 被引量:1
  • 10Payne J W, Bettman J R. Measuring constructed preferences: towards a building code. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1999,19:243~270 被引量:1

共引文献12

同被引文献57

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部