摘要
为了了解影响医科大学学报审稿人审稿质量的因素及各因素对审稿人审稿质量的影响程度,采用自制的经专家论证的问卷调查表对4种高校学报的400名编委及审稿人进行了匿名式问卷调查。结果表明,所设计的11个影响因素的得分总体比较、两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。以数理方法筛选出影响医科大学学报审稿人审稿质量的主要因素,为编辑同人寻求避免某些不利因素的方法提供了实证依据。
To understand the factors and their powers on the review quality made by reviewers,an anonymous questionnaire survey was performed on 400 reviewers from four academic journals of four different medical universities by a sheet of self-designedquestionnaire validated by experts.The scores of designed 11 factors were compared with each other,and the results showed that the differences were statistically significant（P0.05）.The author filtered the main factors influencing the review quality of reviewers for journals of medical universities by adopting mathematical methods,and provided empirical evidence for editors to find ways of avoiding these factors,which showed significant importance in improving the overall quality of academic journals of medical universities.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第2期105-108,共4页
Acta Editologica
关键词
审稿人
审稿质量
影响因素
医科大学学报
reviewer
review quality
influential factor
journal of medical university
