期刊文献+

听力理解中元语篇的作用及其与话题熟悉度和语言水平的关系 被引量:8

The Role of Metadiscourse in Listening Comprehension & Its Relation to Topic Familiarity and Language Proficiency
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究以142名英语专业学生为对象,主要探讨元语篇对听力理解的作用,并探讨其与学习者话题熟悉度及整体语言水平之间的关系。根据学业成绩,全体学生被分为水平相当的两组,分别听同一个TEM8(Test for English Majors-Band8)微型学术讲座的不同版本(含元语篇和不含元语篇)并完成相同的任务(细节回顾、概要写作、填空)。研究结果表明:1)元语篇对听力理解的促进作用显著;2)话题熟悉度与听力理解间似乎并不呈简单的线性关系,其作用需在元语篇的辅佐之下方能最大程度地得以彰显;3)元语篇对不同语言水平学生提高听力理解率的贡献有差异,受益大小依次为中等水平、高水平和低水平学生。 This study explores the role of metadiscourse in listening comprehension,and examines the relationship between metadiscourse and topic familiarity,as well as between metadiscourse and language proficiency.The study employed 142 English majors as participants,who were,based on their achievements,divided into two groups with similar language proficiency and listened to two different versions of a TEM8(Test for English Majors-Band 8)mini-lecture,one with metadiscourse and the other without.Both groups were required to finish the tasks of detail-recalling,summary-writing and blank-filling after listening.Significant research results are as follows upon the completion of the statistical analysis:1)Metadiscourse facilitates listening significantly.2)There seems to be a non-linear relationship between topic familiarity and listening comprehension,i.e.only with the help of metadiscourse can topic familiarity facilitate listening comprehension.3)The contribution of metadiscourse is not exactly the same to listeners with different language proficiencies:average achievers benefit the most while low achievers benefit the least.
作者 吴飒
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期57-61,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 江南大学人文社科预研项目(项目编号:2008WYY007) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(项目编号:JUSRP21014)的阶段性成果
关键词 元语篇 话题熟悉度 语言水平 听力理解 metadiscourse topic familiarity language proficiency listening comprehension
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Berne, J. Examining the relationship between L2 listening research, pedagogical theory and practice [ J ]. Foreign Language Annals, 1998,31 (2). 被引量:1
  • 2Chaudron, C. & J. Richards. The effect of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures [ J ]. Applied Linguistics, 1986,7 ( 2 ). 被引量:1
  • 3Cheng, X. & M. Steffensen. Meta-discourse : A technique for improving student writing [ J ]. Research in the Teaching of English, 1996, 30(2). 被引量:1
  • 4Chiang, C. & P. Dunkel. The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning [ J ]. TESOL Quarterly, 1992,26 ( 2 ). 被引量:1
  • 5Chrismore, A. , R. Markannen & M. S. Steffensen. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing : A study of texts written by American and Finish university students[ J ]. Written Communication, 1993,10 ( 1 ). 被引量:1
  • 6Flowerdew,J. & S. Tauroza. The effect of discourse markers on second language lecture comprehension [ J ]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1995 ( 17 ). 被引量:1
  • 7Halliday, M. Explorations in the Functions of Language [ M ]. London: Edward Arnold. 1973. 被引量:1
  • 8Hyland, K. & P. Tse. Meta-discourse in academic writing:A reap, praisal [ J ]. Applied Linguistics ,2004,25 ( 2 ). 被引量:1
  • 9Intaraprawat, P. & M. Steffensen. The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1995,4(3). 被引量:1
  • 10Long, D. What you don't know can't help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension [ J ]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1990 (12). 被引量:1

二级参考文献103

  • 1徐海铭,潘海燕.元语篇的理论和实证研究综述[J].外国语,2005,28(6):54-61. 被引量:41
  • 2Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words [M], Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press. 被引量:1
  • 3Bechtold, B., & R, Johnson, 1989. Statistics for Business and Economics [ M ]. Boston : PWSKent Publishing Company. 被引量:1
  • 4Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad & E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English [ M ]. London : Pearson Education Limited. 被引量:1
  • 5Chafe, W. 1986. Evidentiaity in English conversation and academic writing IA]. In Chafe & Nicholas (eds,). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [C]. Norwood, NJ : Ablex. 被引量:1
  • 6Cheng, B. 2000. Philosophical Studies of Logic [M]. Beijing: The Press of the People's University of China. 被引量:1
  • 7Cheng, X. G. & M. S. Steffensen. 1996. Metadiscourse: A technique for improving studentwriting [J]. Research in the Teaching of English Vol. 30 (2): 149-181. 被引量:1
  • 8Conley, T. M. 1983. Interpersonal Communication [M]. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press. 被引量:1
  • 9Connor, U., & J. Laurer. 1985. Understanding persuasive essay writing: Linguistic /rhetoric approach [J]. Text 5 (4): 309-326. 被引量:1
  • 10Crismore, A. 1990. Meta-discourse and Discourse Processes: Interaction and Issues [J]. Discourse Processes 13: 191-205. 被引量:1

共引文献290

同被引文献95

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部