期刊文献+

我国与CAC、美国、欧盟食用香料安全性评价的比较研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study on the Safety Assessment of Flavorings in CAC, United States,European Union and China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探寻我国在食用香料安全性评价中存在的不足,提出改进与完善该评价体系的建议。方法搜集我国、CAC、美国和欧盟现行有效的食用香料安全性评价体系与暴露评估方法的相关资料,对其进行比较研究。结果 CAC、美国、欧盟和我国在有关食用香料安全性评价机构、暴露评估方法和安全性评价程序等方面不尽相同。结论我国在暴露评估方法及暴露量数据、安全性评价程序、毒性资料数据库建立等方面存在一些不足,建议进一步完善我国对食用香料的安全性评估,并进行使用效果评价,建立较为完善、便于查询的毒性资料数据库等。 Objective To compare the safety assessment systems on flavorings in China,the United States,European Union and Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC),and to put forward and improve the safety assessment system in China. Method Current and valid regulations and methods on safety assessment of flavorings in CAC,the United States, European Union and China were collected,compared and analyzed. Results The specific agencies for safety assessment of flavorings,methods for evaluating exposure,and procedures for safety assessment in CAC,the United States,European Union and China were not the same. Conclusion Some defects in the safety assessment of flavorings in China were found. It is suggested that the food safety assessment system in China should be perfected further,and a normative toxicological database for flavorings should be set up.
出处 《中国食品卫生杂志》 北大核心 2010年第6期545-548,共4页 Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene
关键词 食用香料 安全性评价 暴露评估 比较 Flavorings Safety Assessment Exposure Evaluation Comparation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1CHEN JUN SHI Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing 100050, China.The Role of Sciencein Codex Standards[J].Biomedical and Environmental Sciences,2001,14(1):145-148. 被引量:2
  • 2SCHRANKEL K R. Safety evaluation of food flavorings [ J ]. Toxicology, 2004, 198 ( 1-3 ) :203-211. 被引量:1
  • 3HALLAGAN J B, HALL R L. FEMA GRAS-A GRAS Assessment Program for flavor ingredients [ J ]. Regulat Toxieol Pharmacol, 1995, 21(3) : 422-430. 被引量:1
  • 4EFSA. EFSA-CEF-Food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids [ EB/OL]. [ 2009]. http://www. efsa. europa. eu/EFSA/ScientificPanels/efsa _ locale-1178620753812 _ CEF. htm. 被引量:1
  • 5World Health Organization. Evaluation of food additives and contaminants[ R ]. Swittzerland: Sixty-eighth report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 2007: 57-158. 被引量:1
  • 6SMITH R L, COHEN S M, DOLL J. Criteria for the safety evaluation of flavoring substances The Expert Panel of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association [J]. Food Chem Toxicol, 2005, 43: 1141-1177. 被引量:1
  • 7中国香料香精化妆品工业协会,国际食用香料工业组织,国际生命科学学会中国办事处.第三届中国香料香精高层论坛,北京,2008-04-26-27[C].北京,2008. 被引量:1
  • 8IOFI. IOFI and codex alimentarius [ EB/OL]. [ 2009 ]. http:// www. iofi. org/Iofi/English/Home/Flavor-Safety/IOFI-and-Codex- Alimentarius -Commission/page. aspx/35. 被引量:1
  • 9贾旭东,刘兆平,张晓鹏,宋雁,向钱,张文众,张俭波,樊永祥,王竹天,李宁.中国常用食品添加剂毒理学数据库研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2009,21(6):520-522. 被引量:4

二级参考文献3

  • 1中华人民共和国食品安全法[Z].全国人大,2009,06,01. 被引量:16
  • 2NAKANO K, OKADA S, TOYOKUNI S, et al. Renal changes induced by chronic oral administration of potassium bromate or ferric nitrilotriacetate in Wistar rats[ J]. Naikan Hokan Jap Arch Int Med, 1989,36: 41-47. 被引量:1
  • 3JECFA. Summary of evaluations performed by theJoint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on FoodAdditives[ EB/OL]. (2005 - 05 - 29) [ 2008 - 07 - 08 ]. http://www. inchem. org/doeuments/jecfa/jeceval/jec_ 1969. htm. 被引量:1

共引文献4

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部