摘要
举证责任是当事人取得诉讼信心并决定是否进入诉讼的第一道门槛。环境污染侵权诉讼不同于一般民事诉讼,我国法律及司法解释对环境污染侵权诉讼双方当事人的举证责任作了"不平等"的差别规定。这种"差别待遇"主要是基于"保护弱者"和"倾斜立法"的考虑。根据举证责任的分配,双方当事人应当根据相关证据的类型、获取方式,积极提供有利于自己的证据。
The burden of proof is the first threshold for the litigant to gain confidence and determine whether to get into the action of litigation.The ligation of environmental pollution tort is different from the civil ones.In China,the legal and judicial interpretation of the litigation of the environmental tort makes a difference in the distribution of the burden of proof on the two parties concerned.In the specific litigation practice,the plaintiff bears the burden to prove that the accused has actualized the pollution and to show their sufferings and losses resulting from the pollution;and the defendant has to refute the plaintiff＇s request and is required to prove whether there exists the legal relief and whether there is no causal relationship between the pollution and the losses.According to the allocation of the burden of proof,the two parties should provide positive evidence by means of adopting the appropriate ways to obtain relevant evidence.
出处
《商丘师范学院学报》
CAS
2010年第8期100-105,共6页
Journal of Shangqiu Normal University
基金
2008年福建省教育厅A类社会科学研究项目:"环境侵权司法救济研究"(编号:JA08266S)
关键词
环境侵权
环境污染侵权诉讼
举证责任
举证实务
environmental tort
litigation practice of environmental pollution tort
burden of proof
practice
