摘要
中国反垄断法的实施一般由公共执行所垄断,但是,公共执行事实上却存在机构设置、公法责任等方面的局限性,因而反垄断法的实施不应由公共执行所垄断,还应引入私人执行,因为私人执行不仅是一种权利救济的途径,也是反垄断法的实施方式之一,有助于弥补和矫正公共执行的不足。在现行法律框架下,中国反垄断法私人执行可采取民事诉讼、仲裁、行政诉讼等三种方式。
The enforcement of the anti-monopoly law in China is in itself monopolized by the public enforcement, which has limitations in various aspects such as the setup of enforcement organizations and the public law obligations. Therefore, rather than be restricted to the public enforcement, the enforcement of anti-monop- oly law should be complemented by the private enforcement, which constitutes not only a way of fight relief but also one of the means for the enforcement of anti-monopoly law and can help remedy the deficiencies in the public enforcement. Under the current legal framework, the private enforcement of anti-monopoly law in China can be implemented in the forms of civil action, arbitration, and administrative action.
出处
《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期24-30,共7页
Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
反垄断法
私人执行
公共执行
权利救济
anti-monopoly law
private enforcement
public enforcement
right relief
