摘要
反垄断争议能否适用当事人约定的仲裁条款是目前学界以及司法实践中存在争议的问题。司法实践表明,我国对于反垄断争议整体上采取不可仲裁的立场。但是,在欧盟、美国等法域中,已经出现了反垄断争议通过仲裁解决的先例,反垄断争议逐渐被纳入国际商事仲裁实践中可仲裁的范围之内。然而,分析我国反垄断法与仲裁法中有关垄断纠纷的争议解决制度以及部分典型案例,并与域外国家实践进行对比,可以发现我国对反垄断争议可仲裁性仍持谨慎态度。通过本次《仲裁法》的修订,我国亦应当将反垄断争议纳入可仲裁纠纷范围,并建立法院对涉垄断争议仲裁裁决的特殊审查机制,以协调反垄断法与仲裁制度之间的冲突。
Whether or not anti-trust disputes apply to the arbitration clause agreed upon by the parties is currently a controversial issue in academia as well as in judicial practice.Judicial practice in China shows a negative attitude of arbitrability of anti-trust disputes.However,extraterritorial practice in the European Union and the United States of America,has involved the arbitration mechanism to resolve some antitrust disputes,showing that antitrust disputes have already been included within the scope of arbitrable matters in international commercial arbitration practice.By analyzing the dispute resolution systems regarding antitrust disputes in China’s Anti-Monopoly Law and Arbitration Law,as well as some typical cases,and comparing them with the practices of foreign jurisdictions,it can be found that China is still cautious about the arbitrability of antitrust disputes.Through the revision of the Arbitration Law,China should also include antitrust disputes within the scope of arbitrable disputes and establish a special judicial review mechanism for arbitration awards related to antitrust disputes,in order to reconcile the conflicts between antitrust law and the arbitration system.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2023年第3期116-130,共15页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词
反垄断争议
国际商事仲裁
《仲裁法》修订
可仲裁性
anti-trust disputes
international commercial arbitration
amendments on arbitration law
arbitrability
