期刊文献+

利奈唑胺与万古霉素对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌体外抗菌活性 被引量:7

Bactericidal activity of linezolid and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价利奈唑胺(噁唑烷酮类抗菌药)、万古霉素(胺基糖苷类抗生素)2种抗菌药物对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的体外抗菌活性。方法用琼脂二倍稀释法,测定抗菌药物的最低抑菌浓度(MIC);用肉汤稀释法,测定抗菌药物的最低杀菌浓度(MBC),绘制杀菌曲线(KCs)。结果利奈唑胺对临床分离的98株MRSA的MIC50为1μg.mL-1,MIC90为2μg.mL-1,MBC50为8μg.mL-1,MBC90为32μg.mL-1,敏感率为100%;万古霉素对临床分离的98株MRSA的MIC50为1μg.mL-1,MIC90为1μg.mL-1,MBC50为8μg.mL-1,MBC90为32μg.mL-1,敏感率为100%。随着抗菌药物浓度的升高,其杀菌时间缩短不甚明显,呈现非浓度依赖性的特点。结论利奈唑胺对MRSA的体外抗菌活性与万古霉素相当,均显示非浓度依赖性的杀菌曲线。 Objective To evaluated the in vitro antimicrobial activities of linezolid and vancomycin agents against methicillin -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents were determined by the standard two -fold agar dilution method. The minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) antibacterial agents were determined by tube broth dilution method and time -killing curves were obtained. Results The sensitive rates to linezolid and vancomycin against MRSA were both 100%, the MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 μg·mL^-1,1 μg·mL^-1 and 2 μg·mL^-1, 1 μg·mL^-1. 32 μg·mL^-1 respectively. The MBC50 and MBC90 were both 8μg·mL^-1,32μg·mL^-1, respectively. With the increase of drug concentrations, the killing time did not show obvious decline. Conclusion Linezolid and vancomycin have strong antibacterial activity against MRSA, and they have nonconcentration independent characteristic.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第8期593-596,共4页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30873127)
关键词 利奈唑胺 万古霉素 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 最低抑菌浓度 杀菌曲线 linezolid vancomycin methicillin - resistant Staphylococcus Staphylococcus minimal inhibitory concentration timekilling curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Diekema DJ,Jones RN.Oxazolidinone antibiotics[J].Lancet,2001;358:1975-1982. 被引量:1
  • 2Ament PW,Jamshed N,Home JP.Linezolid:Its role in the treatment of gram-positive,drug-resistantbacterial infections[J].American Family Physician,2002;65:663-670. 被引量:1
  • 3Kollef MH.Limitations of vancomycin in the management of resistant staphylococcal infections[J].Clin Infect Diseases,2007;45:191-195. 被引量:1
  • 4Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing[M].M100-S18,January 2009:Vol.28 No.1. 被引量:1
  • 5Amsterdam D.Pestantibiotic effect[A].Lorian V.Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine (4rid Ed)[M].New York (USA):Williams & Wilkins,1996:52-111. 被引量:1
  • 6Enright MC,Robinson DA,Randel G,et al.The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci,2002;99:7687-7692. 被引量:1
  • 7Ross JE,Frische TR,Sader HS,et al.Oxazolidinone susceptibility patterns for 2005:Internationsl Report from the Zyvox Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum Study[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2007;29:295-301. 被引量:1
  • 8Cercenado E,Garcia-Garrote F,Bouza E.In vitro activity of linesolid against multiply resistant Gram-positive clinical isolates[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,2001;47:77-81. 被引量:1
  • 9Cruciani M,Gatti G.Penetration of vancomycin into human lung tissue[J].J Antimicrob Chemother,1996;38:865-869. 被引量:1
  • 10Conte JE,Golden JA,Kipps J,et al.Intrapulmonsry pharmacokinetics of linesolid[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2002;46:1475-1480. 被引量:1

同被引文献61

  • 1黄学忠,林佩佩,陈晓飞.1385株临床流行菌株调查及耐药分析[J].东南国防医药,2011,13(3):219-222. 被引量:8
  • 2Anguita-Alonso P, Rouse MS, Piper KE, et al. Comparative study of antimicrobial release kinetics from polymethylmethacrylate [ J ]. Clin Orthop ,2006,445:239-244. 被引量:1
  • 3Anagnostakos K, Furst O, Kelm J. Antibiotic-impreganted PMMA hip spacers: current status[ J]. Acta Orthop,2006,77:628-637. 被引量:1
  • 4Stevens DL, Herr D, Lampiris H, et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections [ J ]. Clin Infect Dis,2002,34 : 1481-1490. 被引量:1
  • 5Till M, Wixson RL, Pertel PE. Linezolid treatment for osteomyelitis due to vancomycin-resistant Enteroeoecus faecium [Jl. Clin Infect Dis,2002,34:1412-1414. 被引量:1
  • 6Lovering AM, Zhang J, Bannister GC , et al. Penetration of linezolid into bone, fat, muscle and haematoma of patients undergoing routine hip replacement [ J ]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2002,50 : 73 -77. 被引量:1
  • 7Kollef MH. Limitations of vancomycin in the management of resistant staphylococcal infections [ J ]. Clin Infect Diseases, 2007, 45:191-195. 被引量:1
  • 8Anguita-Alonso P, Rouse MS, Piper KE, et al. Comparative study of antimicrobial release kinetics from polymethylmethacrylate [ J ]. Clin Orthop,2006,445:239-244. 被引量:1
  • 9Trampuz A, Osrnon DR, Hansseen AD, et al. Molecular and antibioflim approaches to prosthetic joint infection [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2003, 414:69-88. 被引量:1
  • 10Anagnostakos K. Antimicrobial properties and elution kinetics of linezolid-loaded hip spacers in vitro [J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater,2008, 87 : 173-178. 被引量:1

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部