摘要
近代以来,基于个人独立和男女平等的价值理念,婚姻关系中所包含的同居、相互协力、相互扶助等权利义务被概括为配偶权。配偶权具有鲜明的伦理色彩,兼具绝对权与相对权的双重特征。由于性道德、性观念在现代社会已经发生显著的变化,任何人不能强迫配偶与其建立婚姻同居关系。因此,第三者与配偶一方相奸、同居甚至重婚,无过错的配偶无权依据《侵权责任法》第2条的规定要求第三者承担侵权责任。《婚姻法》第46条规定的离婚损害赔偿责任与《侵权责任法》第2条规定的一般侵权损害赔偿之间,并非特别法与一般法的关系。因此,在配偶权受到侵害的情形,我国《侵权责任法》并无适用的余地。
In modern age, based on the values of personal independence, equality between the sexes and identity of spouse, spouse right is generalized to the rights and obligations of cohabitation, assist and cooperate with each other between couples. Not only does it have dual characteristics of absolute right and relative right, but also with bright ethical features. With the significant change of sexual morality and perception, anyone cannot compel the mate to build the relationship of cohabitation in modern society. Consequently, if the other man or woman has illicit sexual relations with one spouse, the unblamable spouse hasn’t claim on the other man or woman to bear the tortious liability according to the provisions of Article 2 in tort law. It isn’t the relationship of general law and special law between the duty of divorce damage compensation of the 46th item in marriage law and the general tortious damage compensation of the 2nd item in the tort law. Therefore, there is no suitable space for the application of our tort law in face of the situation that spouse right has been violated.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第4期106-111,共6页
Legal Forum
关键词
配偶权
侵权法
第三者
忠实义务
离婚损害赔偿
spouse right
tort law
the other man or woman
duty of loyalty
divorce damage compensation
