期刊文献+

科研人员接受OA知识库的影响因素分析——一项基于先导访谈的探索性研究 被引量:16

Factors Influencing Researchers' Adoption of OA Repositories as Authors:An Exploring Study Based on Pilot Interviews
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对13位中国科研人员的先导访谈,发现促进科研人员接受OA知识库的影响因素有:认为利用OA知识库能够扩大论文的影响力;出版速度更快;"先发表再评审"机制可以避免传统同行评审的某些弊端;出于对知识共享的信念。而阻碍科研人员不接受OA知识库的影响因素则包括:对OA知识库认知不够;担心论文质量得不到保证;担心会破坏与传统期刊的关系;担心论文被他人剽窃;认为OA研究成果尚未得到同行和现行学术评价体系的认可。 User Acceptance is one of the key fundamentals for the development and success of OA Repositories. Based on the pilot interviews of 13 Chinese researchers, this paper concludes several factors which influence the researchers' adoption of OA Repositories as authors. There are sueh reasons showing that researchers would like to use OA Repositories as believing OA Repositories could increase the papers' impact and shorten the publishing lag time. While researches gave as well many reasons for not using OA Repositories such as having little knowledge of it and little motivation to use it, associating with unguranteed quality, confused copyright issues, fear of plagiarism and having one's work scooped, etc.
作者 李武 杨琳
出处 《大学图书馆学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期98-103,共6页 Journal of Academic Libraries
关键词 开放存取 OA知识库 用户接受 先导访谈 影响因素 Open Access OA Repositories User Acceptance Pilot Interviews
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Gerard van Westrienen, Clifford A. Lynch. Academic Institutional Repositories Deployment Status in 13 Nations as of Mid 2005 D-Lib Magazine. 2005(11: 9). [2009-03-17]. http://dlib, ejour nal. ascc. net/dlib/september05/westrienen/09westrienen, html. 被引量:1
  • 2Philip M.D. & Matthew J, L. Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine.2007(13: 3/4). [2009-03-17]. http://www, dlib. org/ dlib/march07/davis/03davis, html. 被引量:1
  • 3Suber, P. Open Access Overview: Focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. [ 2008-12-1]. http ://www. earlham, edu/- peters/los/overview, htm. 被引量:1
  • 4Lincoln, Y. , & Guba, E. Naturalistic inquiry . New York: Sage, 1985. 124-127. 被引量:1
  • 5Philip M. Davis. & Matthew J. L. Institutional Repositories: E valuating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace D-Lib Magazine. 2007(13: 3/4). [2009-02-11]. http://www.dlib. org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html. 被引量:1
  • 6Philip M. Davis. & Matthew J. L. Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace D-Lib Magazine. 2007(13: 3/4). [2009-02 -22]. http://www.dlib. org/dlib/marehOT/davis/03davis, html. 被引量:1
  • 7Michael Day. Prospects for institutional e-prlnt repositories in the United Kingdom. 2003-05. [2009-01-09]. http://eprints-uk, rdn. ac. uk/projeet/docs/studies/impact/. 被引量:1

同被引文献339

引证文献16

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部