期刊文献+

高等教育质量评议与提升路向 被引量:17

Appraisal of quality and promotion in higher education
原文传递
导出
摘要 高等教育质量是系统性质量,显示出结构层次性、分类定位性和个体指向性等基本特征,它受其职责、专业、课程、产出、声誉、跟踪等因素影响。只有根据高等教育质量的基本特征,并对这些因素加以重视、研究及有效控制,从职责上履行使命,在专业上制订基准,课程经同行评价,产出有结果检测,从而在分类排行中获得声誉,享有满意的顾客评价,才能保证质量。同时,高等教育应依据质量信息进行决策,加强质量伙伴合作关系,完善校园质量保证体系,开发学术质量保障策略,才可望从实践中持续地提升质量。 Quality in higher education is of systematic quality,which demonstrates stratification of its structures,orientation of classification,and individual directivity.It is influenced by factors including institution responsibility,majors,courses,outputs,reputations,quality tracking,etc.Only by referring to the essential quality features,and by highlighting,analyzing and controlling these appraising factors,can institutions of higher education assure their quality.Appraisal of quality includes the following steps,which are fulfilling the mission,setting benchmarks upon majors,receiving course appraisal from peers,inspecting consequential results.Therefore,the institution could gain reputation in classified rankings as well as satisfying customer feedbacks.Besides,institutions of higher education should make decisions according to the appraisal of quality,strengthen relationship between partners involving quality of higher education,improve institutional quality assurance system and develop strategies of protection for academic quality.Then higher education quality can be expected to improve continually in practice.
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期6-11,42,共7页 Journal of Higher Education
关键词 高等教育质量 系统性质量 评价因素 评议框架 higher education quality systematic quality appraising factors appraising framework.
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1安心著..高等教育质量保证体系研究[M].兰州:甘肃教育出版社,1999:236.
  • 2教育大辞典(增订合编本)(上)[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1998.798. 被引量:3
  • 3朱志媛,杜红琴.论新时期的高等教育质量[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2008(2):136-140. 被引量:1
  • 4胡弼成.趋近个体:高等教育政策制定的价值取向[N].科学时报,2008-09-02. 被引量:2
  • 5胡弼成.高等教育质量观的演进[J].教育研究,2006,27(11):24-28. 被引量:161
  • 6DIANA GREEN. What is Quality in Higher Education? [M]. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1994.25. 被引量:1
  • 7ABOUT MIT. http:PPweb, mit. eduPabout-mit, html. 被引量:1
  • 8http://www. mdc. edu/main/about/mission_vision. asp. 被引量:1
  • 9ROSIE BINGHAM,ROGER OOTTEWILL. Whatever happened to peer review? Revitalising the contribu- tion of tutors to course evaluation[J]. Quality Assurance in Education, 2001, (1). 被引量:1
  • 10E·格威狄·博格.金伯利·宾汉·霍尔.高等教育中的质量与问责[M].毛亚庆,刘冷馨,译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2008:242. 被引量:12

二级参考文献13

共引文献223

同被引文献185

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部