期刊文献+

公共健康与公民自由:张力与平衡——建立在美国公共卫生案例分析的基础上 被引量:4

The Tension and Balance Between Public Health and Civil Liberty:Based on the Analysis of the Case of Public Health of America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "集体"导向的公共卫生干预理念主张在公共健康和公众福利受到威胁时公民的基本自由权利应受到必要的限制,而"个人"导向的公民自由理念主张在俗世社会中任何行动的权威只能来源于有行为能力的道德主体的同意。两种观念的对立反映出在公共卫生领域中长期存在的公共健康与个人自由之间的张力。在公共卫生领域,我们应该将公共健康放在优先位置,同时应该用"人的生命尊严"作为边界限制。 The concept of "Community-oriented" public health interfere suggests that the basic civil liberty should be necessarily restrained when public health and general welfare are at risk. On the contrary, the con- cept of "Individual-oriented" civil liberty suggests that in the secular society, the authority of every movement in the society should come from the agreement of the moral subjects. These two concepts reveal the tension between public health and civil liberty in the field of public health. In the area of public health, we should put public health in the first place, and at the time, we should use the "dignity of human life" as the negative restraint.
作者 绪宗刚
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第1期7-12,共6页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 公共卫生干预 公民自由 人的生命尊严 public health interfere civil liberty dignity of human life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1James A. Tobey. Public health and Religious freedom. American journal of public health [ J ]. October 1954: 1295. 被引量:1
  • 2Wendy K. Mariner JD. Jacobson v. Massachusetts: It' s not your great - great - grandfather' s public health law [ J ]. American journal of public health. April 2005: 583, 585. 被引量:1
  • 3Lawrence O. Gostin, JD. Jacobson v. Massachusetts at 100 years: police power and civil liberties in tension [ J ]. America journal of public heath, April 2005 : 578, 580. 被引量:1
  • 4密尔著,论自由,许宝暌译[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007:4. 被引量:2
  • 5恩格尔哈特著,生命伦理学的基础[M].范瑞平译,长沙:湖南科技出版社,1996:50. 被引量:1
  • 6JD Moreno. Deciding together: bioethics and moral consent [ J ]. Annals of internal medicine. November 1996. 被引量:1
  • 7Patrick E Carroll. Medical police and the history of public health. Medical history [ J ]. 2002. 被引量:1
  • 8韩跃红.生命伦理评价中的方法论问题探讨[J].自然辩证法研究,2003,19(1):93-96. 被引量:4
  • 9邱仁宗.高新生命技术的伦理问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2001,17(5):21-27. 被引量:31
  • 10Richard J. Haskell. A Cost - Benefit Analysis of California's Mandatory Premarital Screening Program for Syphilis [ J]. The western journal of medicine. October 1984 : 538. 被引量:1

二级参考文献18

共引文献102

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部