期刊文献+

教育增值评估的模型构建——以某市三十所高级中学语文评估为例 被引量:3

Model Construction of Value-added Assessment:a Case of Chinese Language Teaching Assessments in Thirty Senior High Schools
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学校效能研究的兴起为教育评价的改革指出了一条发展之路。教育增值评估是目前学校效能评价领域较为科学合理的一种方法。本文在对某市高中语文进行增值评估模型构建的基础上认为,多层线性模型是较为有效的教育增值评估模型。学生的学习能力水平、入学时的语文成绩以及学生的性别对于其高中语文学习有显著影响;学校学生的平均入学成绩、学校的规模以及学校的文理科比例对于学校的语文增值有显著影响。 The rise of school effectiveness studies has pointed out direction of development for the revolution of educational assessments. At present, as a method of school effectiveness assessment, value-added assessment is a relatively scientific and reasonable way of assessment. Based on the model construction of value-added assessment of Chinese language teaching in high schools, the following conclusions are drawn: 1 )HLM is a better accepted model for educational assessment; 2 )It should be noted that factors such as students' learning abilities, previous scores and gender have a remarkable influence on their study of Chinese in high school; 3)Factors such as students' average score in the entrance examination for high school, the size of the school and its ratio of students in science and liberal arts also have an important impact on value-added measures in Chinese subject.
出处 《考试研究》 2010年第1期73-91,共19页 Examinations Research
基金 江西省研究生创新基金项目资助
关键词 学校效能 增值评估 多层线性模型 语文增值 school effectiveness value-added assessment Hierarchical Linear Models value-added measures in Chinese subject
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1Scheerens, J (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning,School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1,(1):61-80. 被引量:1
  • 2Thomas, S. (2001). Dimensions of Secondary School Effectiveness: Comparative Analyses Across Regions.School Effectiveness and School Improvement 12 (3) : 285-322. 被引量:1
  • 3Goldstein, H (1993). Assessment and Accountability,Education, 183, (3): 33-34. 被引量:1
  • 4Sammon.s, P, Thomas, S & Mortimore, P (1997).Forging Links: Effective Schools and Effective Departments,London: Paul Chapman, ISBN 1-85396-349-6. 被引量:1
  • 5Thomas, S (1998). Value Added Measures in School Effeetiveness in the United Kingdom, Prospects, 28. (1): 91-108. 被引量:1
  • 6Goldstein, H (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models, second edition. Kendall's library of statistics 3. London, Sydney,Auckland: Edward Arnold. 被引量:1
  • 7Goldstein, H (1997). Methods in School Effectiveness Research, School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 8, (4)369-395. 被引量:1
  • 8Thomas, S, Sarnmons, P, Mortimore, P & Smees, R(1997). Stability and consistency in secondary schools' effects on students" GCSE outcomes over 3 years, .School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, (2): 169-197. 被引量:1
  • 9Scheerens, J., Glas C.& Thomas S. (2003). Educational Evaluation, Assessment and Monitoring: a systemic approach.Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers. 被引量:1
  • 10Teddlie, C. & D. Reynolds (2000). The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research. London and New York, Routledge Falmer. 被引量:1

共引文献156

同被引文献35

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部