摘要
我国选择了渐进市场化的改革道路,这是一条有别于西方市场经济理论的改革道路,尽管在实践上取得了巨大的成就,但在理论上却备受争议。本文试图通过理论的角度,分析说明渐进式改革从总体上优于休克疗法式的改革,并指出,在渐进式改革的过程中,只单方面进行体制内或体制外的改革,效果都是一样的,并且是渐进式改革模式中效率最差的。而同时进行体制内和体制外的市场化改革是最优的渐进改革模式。
China selects gradualism during the transition to the market system from centrally planned economy, which is different from reform of western economic theory. Although achieves great accomplishment, but it suffers from many criticisms theoretically. By constructing a series of theoretical models, this paper concludes that progressive reform is better than shock therapy as a whole. It points out that the outcomes are the same if China reforms merely whether in the system or outside the system during progressive reform, and the efficiency of this outcome mentioned above is the lowest among the outcomes of progressive reform. Finally, this paper also points out that economic reform carried out both in and outside the system simultaneously is the best progressive reform pattern.
出处
《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期60-67,共8页
Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
教育部新世纪人才资助项目(NCET-06-0023)的阶段成果
关键词
改革
渐进式
休克疗法式
消费者剩余
市场效率
progressive reform
shock therapy reform
consumer surplus
market efficiency
