期刊文献+

社会科学论文中模糊限制语的人际意义研究 被引量:11

On Interpersonal Meaning of Hedges in Social Science Research Papers
原文传递
导出
摘要 论文运用定性与定量方法,考察社会科学论文中模糊限制语的人际意义。论文指出,社科论文中,作者导向模糊限制语可以帮助作者维护自身面子,评价命题内容及说服读者;读者导向模糊限制语则体现对读者的尊重,显示礼貌和实现语篇多声性等特点。对四类学科简介和讨论部分中10个常用模糊限制语定量分析表明,讨论部分模糊限制语的使用频率略高于简介部分。四种学科在模糊限制语的使用上差异不明显,教育类论文中模糊限制语的使用频率略高于其他三类学科论文。 This paper investigates the interpersonal meaning of hedges in social science research papers through qualitative and quantitative approaches. Writer-oriented hedges can help the writer to protect his face, persuade the reader to accept his argument and evaluate the proposition in the paper, while reader-oriented hedges show the writer' s respect to the potential readers and represent a way of politeness and muhiglossia in the paper. The quantitative analysis of 10 frequently-used hedges in the Introduction and Discussion sections of social science papers in four disciplines reflects that hedges in Discussion are more densely used that in Introduction. The hedges in four disciplines are nearly equally distributed with slightly high percentage in the Educational papers.
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期33-36,53,共5页 Foreign Language Education
关键词 社会科学论文 模糊限制语 人际意义 social science research papers hedge interpersonal meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Brown, P. & Levinson, S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage[M]. Cambridge: CUP, 1987. 被引量:1
  • 2Clemen, G. The concept of Hedging: Origins, approach and definitions[ A]. In Markkanen & Schroder (eds.). Hedging and Discourse [ C]. 1997 : 235-248. 被引量:1
  • 3Crismore, A. & Famsworth, R. Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse[ A] . In Nash ( ed. ). The Writing Scholar: Studies in the Language and Conventions of Academic Discourse [ C ]. Newberry Park CA: Sage, 1990: 118-136. 被引量:1
  • 4Crompton, P. Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems [J]. ESP Journal, 1997,16(4) : 271-287. 被引量:1
  • 5Fraser, B. Hedged Performatives[M]. Bloomington, Ind. : Indiana University Linguistics Club (Mimeo), 1974. 被引量:1
  • 6Grape, W. & Kaplan, R. On the writing of science and the science of writing: Hedging in science text and elsewhere [ A ]. In Markkanen, R. & H. Schroder. ( eds. ). Hedging and Discourse [ C ]. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter, 1997 : 151-167. 被引量:1
  • 7Hyland, K. Hedging in Scientifw Research Articles [ M ]. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 8Hyland, K. Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1996, 17(4) : 433-454. 被引量:1
  • 9Hyland, K. Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks[ J]. ESP Journal, 1994, 13(3) : 239-256. 被引量:1
  • 10Labov, W. The Language in Inner City[ M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972. 被引量:1

同被引文献116

引证文献11

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部