期刊文献+

过度自信的研究展望 被引量:7

THE REVIEW AND PROSPECT OF OVERCONFIDENCE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 过度自信是个体高估自身判断精确度的一种认知偏差。过高估计和过高定位作为过度自信的两种主要类型被认为是个体在评价其绝对能力和相对能力时的表现。一般认为信息加工的偏差与判断误差的无偏性是造成过高估计的主要原因。自我提升动机、权重差异与信息的差异被认为是产生过高定位的原因。但是过度自信的这两种类型却在不同难度的任务中出现了分离现象。最近,研究者提出了贝叶斯过度自信,用贝叶斯推理对不同任务中二者的分离进行了整合。过度自信产生的原因和内在心理机制、过度自信对决策的影响以及过度自信中的个体差异研究将会成为该领域日后研究的趋势。 Overconfidence is a cognitive bias in which people overestimate their own accuracy. Overestimate and overplacement are considered as two central types of overconfidence occurred when individual assess his/her absolute ability and relative ability. In general, biases in information processing and effects of unbiased judgmental error are considered as the main reasons for overconfidence. Reasons for overplacement including motivation of selfenhancement, differential weighting and differential information have been considered. But those two types of overconfidence present separate phenomena in tasks with different difficulties. Recently, Bayesian overconfidence is put forward. The separations of two types of overconfidence in tasks with different difficulties are integrated by using Bayesian inference. The reason and internal psychological mechanism of overconfidence, the influence of overconfidence on decision-making, also the individual differences research in overconfidence will be the focus of this field in the future.
作者 周爱保 赵鑫
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2009年第3期236-240,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
关键词 过度自信 过高估计 过高定位 “简单-困难”效应 贝叶斯推理 overconfidence, overestimation, overplacement, Hard-easy effect, Bayesian inference
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Buehler R, Griffin D, Ross M. Exploring the" planning fallacy" : Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 67 (3) : 366-381. 被引量:1
  • 2Presson P K, Benassi V A. Illusion of control:A meta-analytic review.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1996, 11 (3) : 493-510. 被引量:1
  • 3Clayson D E. Performance overconfidence:Metacognitive effects or misplaced student expectations? Journal of Marketing Education, 2005, 27 (2) : 122-129. 被引量:1
  • 4Joshua K, Jack B S, Barlas S.Overconfidence: It depends on how,what, and whom you ask.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999, 79 (3) : 216-247. 被引量:1
  • 5Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips L D. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980//Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 306-334. 被引量:1
  • 6Hoch S J. Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1985, 11 (4) : 719-731. 被引量:1
  • 7Larrick R P. Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 113 (3) : 440-450. 被引量:1
  • 8Erev I, Wallsten T S, Budescu D V. Simultaneous over-and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review, 1994, 101 (3) : 519-528. 被引量:1
  • 9Svenson O. Are we less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta Psychologica, 1981, 47 (2) : 143-151. 被引量:1
  • 10Zenger T R. Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay, and turnover.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1992, 37:198-219. 被引量:1

同被引文献128

引证文献7

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部