摘要
"保护的责任"自提出以来,迄今已在政治层面获得了广泛的国际共识。在法律层面特别是可操作性层面,国际法院通过对《灭种罪公约》及《消除一切形式种族歧视国际公约》的解释和适用,提出了"作为一种义务存在的干涉"这样一种新观念,强调了所有公约当事国所应承担的"预防责任",间接地回应了《国家对国际不法行为的责任》条款草案第48条,也从法律实践的角度回应了"保护的责任",特别是其中的"预防责任"。通过这种回应,就使国家基于"保护的责任"而采取的某些干涉行动具有合法性。这种回应,将会深刻地影响到国家的行为模式。面对这种新发展所带来的挑战,中国有必要调整自身外交策略。
The concept of the responsibility to protect has received comprehensive consensus in the field of politics since it is formulated by ICISS in 2001. While at the field of international law, especially from the perspective of practical consequence, the International Court of Justice develops a new concept, i.e. , an obligation to intervene during its judicial process of interpretation and application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which could be seen as a kind of re- sponse to R＆P, especially to the responsibility to prevent. This new concept will legalize humanitarian intervention in the field of R＆P, as well as it will deeply influence states＇behavior pattern. In order to face this challenge more effectively, it is necessary for China to modulate its foreign strategies.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第5期55-64,共10页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社科基金项目<国际法中普遍性法律利益的保护问题研究>(08BFX075)
浙江工商大学青年人才基金项目(Q09-16)阶段性成果
关键词
保护的责任
国际法院
灭种罪公约
预防责任
作为义务的干涉
the responsibility to protect
the International Court of Justice
the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
the responsibility to prevent
responsibility to intervene
