摘要
违反"告知后同意"的专业过失侵权包括三个要件:医生负有告知义务而未告知,患者受有损害,以及医生未告知与患者受损害之间存在因果关系。医生得因患者已知、紧急情况、医疗特权等事由而免除告知义务;损害应仅限于患者的具体人身法益的损害,而不包括患者自主决定权;在因果关系判断上宜采"合理患者"标准而非"患者本人"标准,因为"患者本人"标准消解了过失侵权作为医疗纠纷诉因的适当性。
Professional malpractice in violation of ＂informed consent＂, in situation of physician and patient, has three constitutive elements： physician＇ s failure to inform, injury suffered by patient, and causation between the failure and injury. A physician is exempted from the duty to inform under three circumstances： the patient＇ s in - the - known fact, emergency, and therapeutic privilege. Injury refers to specific injury of personal legal interests, rather than patient＇ s right to independent determination. Causation should be determined by reasonable patient doctrine, rather than particular patient doctrine, because the latter weakens the necessity of tort of negligence in medical disputes.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期99-108,共10页
Global Law Review
