摘要
1958年1月15日德国联邦宪法法院对吕特案做出的判决,曾经引起德国社会极大的关注。长期以来,该判决确立的一系列重要原则,包括宪法的适用效力可对私法产生间接的辐射效应、客观价值秩序可作为基本权利与私法益发生冲突时的衡量标准、表达自由在基本权利中居于基础性地位等等,已经成为法学界和司法实践部门的共识。50年后的今天,德国法学家对这一判决的历史价值仍表现出持续关注,并做出更为系统的评价。吕特案判决的贡献在于建立了一个普遍适用于战后西方国家的用于解决基本权利冲突的范式。
The case of Lueth vs Veit Harlan had been caused a great deal of concern in Germany society since its decision was made by the German Federal Constitutional Court in January 15,1958. It has become consensus in the field of law and practice that the decision established a series of important principles for a long time, including the indirect radiance effect of private law caused by constitutional law applying, objective value order being as weighing standard when basic rights and private law interest conflicting, freedom of expression occupying basic positioning in basic rights. In the present day after fifty years, German jurisprudent has still been paying more attention to the historical value of this decision and made more systematic evaluation. The contribution of the decision of the case Lueth vs Veit Harlan lies in establishing a way of dealing with rights conflicts which applies to western countries after the World War Ⅱ.
出处
《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》
2009年第3期41-49,共9页
Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
基金
2007年教育部人文社科项目第2号"中外司法改革对社会变革影响的比较研究"的阶段性研究成果(项目批准号:07JA820012)
关键词
间接的第三方影响
客观价值秩序
交互作用
基本权利冲突平衡
indirect third party effect
objective value order
mutual effect
balance of basic rights conflicts
