期刊文献+

博士培养质量评价:概念、方法与视角 被引量:37

The Evaluation of Ph.D Training Quality:Concepts,Methods and Standpoints
下载PDF
导出
摘要 博士质量评价是博士教育研究中探讨得比较少的问题。本文首先区分了博士教育质量、博士点质量、博士质量这三个互相联系但又有所区别的概念,指出博士质量的内涵包括培养质量和发展质量。其次,文章讨论了从微观层次和宏观层次评价博士培养质量的主要方法——同行评价法和文献计量法。最后,文章从国内外的教育实践出发,分析了当前评价博士质量的两种视角——产品视角和质量视角及其问题。 There is very little literature about the quality evaluation of Ph.D.This paper clarifies the distinction between three relevant conceptions:the quality of doctoral education, the quality of doctoral program and the quality of Ph.D.;discusses the different methods of the quality evaluation of doctoral education from the macro and micro level and finally points out two perspectives of evaluating quality of doctoral education: the product-based and the process-based.
作者 沈文钦
出处 《北京大学教育评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期47-59,共13页 Peking University Education Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1William Clark. (2006). Academic charisma and the origins of the research university. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2006 : 192-194. 被引量:1
  • 2Simpson, R. (1983). How the PhD came to Britain: A century of struggle for postgraduate education. Guildford: Society for Research into Higher Education. :135. 被引量:1
  • 3Thomas B. Hoffer. (2004). Doctorate recipients from United States universities: Summary report 2004,Chicago: National Opinion Research Centre. 被引量:1
  • 4Ives, Glenice. (2002) . The PhD Supervisory Relationship and Process. Monash University, unpublished dissertation. 被引量:1
  • 5Burgess, R.G. . (1994). Postgraduate Education and Training in the Social Sciences: processes and products. London, Jessica Kingsley. 被引量:1
  • 6Delamont, S. , Atkinson, P. , & Perry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience: Success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer Press. 被引量:1
  • 7Cartter, Allan Murray. (1976). Ph.D. 's and the academic labor market: a report prepared for the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. New York: McGraw-Hill. 被引量:1
  • 8William G. Bowen & Neil L. Rudenstine. (1992) . In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton, N. J. : Princeton University Press. 被引量:1
  • 9Ostriker, J. , & Kuh, CV (Eds.). (2003). Assessing research-doctorate programs: A methodology study. Washington, DC: National Academies Press,9. 被引量:1
  • 10陈学飞 等.西方怎样培养博士[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2002.. 被引量:28

共引文献27

同被引文献364

引证文献37

二级引证文献241

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部