摘要
对抽象性法律、法规的合宪性审查是各国违宪审查体系中的重点,而对审查效力的考察则又是事关违宪审查整个体制建构的基础性问题,法国和美国在此方面可以说是各有特色。通过法美两国违宪审查机关决定的效力范围、决定所约束的程度以及违宪法律的处理和溯及力三个方面的比较研究,我们可知,虽然法国的违宪审查在形式上并不弱于美国,但从实际效果来看,美国的违宪审查更具有权威性和民情的支持。
The review of abstract law and decree play an important role in a nation＇s unconstitutional review system, and the effect is the fundamental problem. The system in France and the U. S. A have their own characteristics. After comparing the two country＇s system from three aspects： the sphere of the effect, the degree of the constraint, and the treatment of the unconstitutional law and its date - back force, draw the conclusion that although the system in France is not inferior to that of America in form, but considering the actual effect, America＇s system is to be more powerful and can acquire stronger support.
出处
《安徽师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第2期169-172,共4页
Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金
安徽省2006年高校青年教师科研资助项目(2006jqw015)
关键词
违宪审查
抽象性
效力
unconstitutional review
abstract
effect
