摘要
欧美法律中商标合理使用主要包括"说明性合理使用"和"被提及的合理使用"两种类型。TRIPS协定第17条是商标合理使用的国际法依据,它并不限制成员在法律中只能规定"说明性合理使用"。当前我国商标合理使用制度存在较多不足,包括法律效力等级低、未规定"被提及的合理使用"、仅适用于注册商标、仅适用于商品商标、对"说明性合理使用"规定不详尽等。《商标法》修改时应进行完善。
In the United States and European countries, fair use of trademark includes both ＇descriptive fair use＇ and ＇nominative fair use＇. Article 17 of the TRIPS Agreement is the source of international law for fair use of trademarks. It does not limit members from providing other kinds of fair use of trademarks besides ＇descriptive fair use＇. The current Trademark Law in China has its shortcomings on fair use of trademark. ＇Nominative fair use＇ cannot be found in laws or regulations. ＇Descriptive fair use＇ is only provided in administrative regulation. In that Regulation, ＇Descriptive fair use＇ can be used only in registered trademark and trademark for goods. China＇ s Trademark Law should be modified as far as fair use of trademark is concerned .
出处
《北京交通大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2009年第2期81-85,共5页
Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)
