摘要
兼语句中兼语动词V1是非终结性的三价动词,V1与补事VP2构成跨越句法层次的、连续的语义关系,具有"无界"倾向,这与"了"的强制性"有界"形式要求不相容,因此"V1+了"不合法。"V1+了"要求兼语NP2必须是受数量词语等修饰的"有界"概念,这使"了"具有了详细说明情状(包括其中的过程与事物)的功能,使VP1、NP2成为兼语句的语义焦点。
The V1 in eoncurrent sentence is a non- terminating trivalent verb. It and the VP2 constitute a semantic relation with an ＂unbounded＂ trend.Otberwise,＂Le＂ has a ＂bounded＂ trend. So V1 and ＂Le＂ don＇t co- oceur.＂V1 ＋ Le＂ demands that the NP2 must be a ＂bounded＂ phrase. And this causes ＂Le＂ describe something in detail, the VP1 and the NP2 become the focus of the sentence.
出处
《成都大学学报（教育科学版）》
2008年第11期117-119,共3页
Journal of Chendu University:Educational Sciences Edition
关键词
兼语句
非终结动词
焦点
无界
有界
concurrent sentence
non - terminating trivalent verb
focus
＂unbounded＂
＂bounded＂
