期刊文献+

论公共教育支出制度的创新——经费制度与凭证制度的比较分析

A Comparative Study: the Fund System vs. the Voucher System in Public Education Expenditure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究从制度经济学视角,对教育凭证制度的运行进行比较制度分析,试图找出经费制度与凭证制度在服务内容、主体角色、行为特征和制度绩效等方面的异同;为教育凭证制度提供支持性证据。 Proceeding from institutional economics, this study compares the the fund system and the voucher system in Public Education Expenditure and finds out their similarities and differences in contents, subjective role, behavioral characteristics and institutional performances. The purpose is to find supportive evidence for the voucher system.
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2008年第5期20-25,共6页 Business Economic Review
关键词 教育经费 凭证 制度创新 educational expenditure,voucher, institutional innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献6

  • 1米尔顿·弗里德曼,罗斯·弗里德曼.自由选择:十人声明[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982.160,164 被引量:1
  • 2Milton Friedman. Public Schools:Make Them Private,Washington Post, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 3米尔顿·弗里德曼.贷丰主义与自由[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986.87 被引量:1
  • 4“BRIFE OF AMICI CURIAE CENTER FOR EDUCATION REFORMET AL.,IN SUPPORT OF PPELIANTS:On Appeal From the United States District Court For tne Northern District of Ohio Eastern Division”,from http://www.edreform.com/briefs/ohio.2000.htm. 被引量:1
  • 5“Competing to Win:How Florida's A+Plom Has Triggered Public School Reform”,By Carol Innerst.From http://www.edreform.com/school-choice/compete.htm. 被引量:1
  • 6“Test-Score Effects of School Vouchers in Dayton,Ohio,New York City,and Washington,D.C.:Evidence from Randomized Field Trials”, by William G. Howell, Patrick J.Wolf. Paul E. Peterson and David E. Campbell, August 2000,Website : http://dada. fas. harvard.edu/pepg/ 被引量:1

共引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部