摘要
日本刑法学中有关构成要件理论的违法.有责行为类型说是由小野清一郎在二战前提出的,二战后经过团藤重光定型说的阐发而成为一段时期内日本刑法学中的通说观点。但是这个学说受到了行为类型说、违法行为类型说的挑战,在刑法学中的影响已是大不如前。现在有学者,认为不同的学说都是以不同的机能期待为前提,学说之间并无优劣、高低之分。
The theories of constructive conditions of illegal and liable types of activities was set forth by Ono Seiichiro（お のせぃいちろう ）before the World War II, and became a generally accepted view after World War II promoted by Dando Shigemitsu（ たんどうしげみつ）. However, this doctrine is challenged by the doctrine of types of activity, the doctrine of types of illegal activity, and its influences are not as broad as before. Some scholar regard that different doctrines vary in predicts of functions, it is not proper to judge which is good and which is bad.
出处
《当代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期131-136,共6页
Contemporary Law Review
关键词
构成要件
构成要件理论
违法
有责类型
机能的考察
constructive conditions
theories of constructive conditions
illegal and liable types
review of functions
