摘要
齐泽克试图在拉康式的黑格尔主义与反资本主义之间建立密切联系。在批判全球资本主义的过程中,齐泽克与其他左翼知识分子之间存在着分歧。齐泽克虽然区分了拉康"实在界"的几种概念,但他把拉康的"实在界"与资本等同起来,这是一种误解。在如何对待列宁政治干预和决断论方面,齐泽克看到了客观的普遍性原则与理论的具体运用之间所存在的缝隙,但又牵强地把普遍性理解为拉康意义上的空缺的能指。齐泽克左翼理论内在的理论困境,表明了他必须重新反思自身立场的张力。
Zizek sets out to bridge the Lacanian Hegelianism and anti -capitalism. Despite their common endeavor to criticize global capitalism, there is a discrepancy between Zizek and other left - wing intellectuals. Although Zizek distinguishes different interpretations of Lacan＇s concept of ie r6el/the real, he misreads it by equating it with capital. In matters of dealing with Lenin＇s theory of political intervention and decisionism, Zizek perceives the chasm between a universal principle and its application in reality. However, the universality of the principle is understood, in a far - fetched fashion, as the empty signifier in Lacan＇s sense of the word. The dilemma of Zizek＇s left - wing theory compels him to reflect on the tension of his own position.
出处
《现代哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期14-30,共17页
Modern Philosophy
