期刊文献+

对“文学经典”问题的诊治——意识形态论的误区与消解 被引量:2

A Diagnostic View of Problems in "Literary Classics"——Misunderstandings in the View of Ideology and Their Removal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文学经典中存在不同的层次。古代文学与当代文学是两种概念构成方式,古代文学经典与当代文学经典也是两种概念构成方式。当代文学是一种事实性描述,而古代文学则是一种解释性概念;古代文学与古代文学经典是一致的,而当代文学经典是对古代文学经典的借用和变形,它不可避免地包含想象的成分。如果混淆了这些区别,就会产生不必要的理论困惑,文学经典的意识形态论就是这样的理论困惑。如果清除这样的误解,我们就会发现文学经典和文学性是文学活动的两面。这里的概念分层主要是一种治疗,它虽然是初步的工作,但廓清概念才能继续前行。 Ancient literature and contemporary literature are two forms of concept, ano so are ancient literary classics and contemporary literary classics. Contemporary literature is a factual description while ancient literature is an explanatory concept. Ancient literature agrees with ancient literary classics whereas contemporary literary classics mean borrowing and variation of ancient literary classics, hence containing unavoidable imaginative elements. A confusion of these distinctions will result in some unnecessary theoretical perplexity, which occurred as the view of ideology o[ literary classics. With the removal of this confusion, we will discover the two side of literary activity, that is, literary classics and literary character. The hierarchization of these concepts means mainly a diagnosis, which is preliminary but won' t continue till all related concepts are discriminated.
作者 王峰
出处 《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期68-72,共5页 Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 文学经典 意识形态 文学性 literary classics ideology literary character
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1南帆..文学理论新读本[M],2002.
  • 2JONATHAN CULLER. Literary Theory [ M ]. London: Oxford University Press, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 3冯天瑜.新语探源[M].北京:中华书局,2004. 被引量:6
  • 4戴燕著..文学史的权力[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002:226.
  • 5袁行霈主编,黄林等卷主编..中国文学史 第4卷[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999:585.
  • 6陆侃如,冯沅君著..中国诗史 下[M].上海:上海书店出版社,1996.

共引文献5

同被引文献49

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部