期刊文献+

量表测评方法在中医临床疗效评价中的应用与展望 被引量:32

Application and Prospect of Scale Measurement and Appraisal in the Assessment in TCM Therapeutic Efficacy Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国外生存质量和患者报告的指标的评价内容与中医问诊的内容基本一致,故同是软指标的中医疗效评价可以借用量表作为评价工具,并逐渐被中医药专家接受和应用。但量表测评方法的应用和中医特色量表的研制等工作尚刚刚起步,存在对量表理论的认识不足,中医特色量表体系尚未形成;量表的选择缺乏针对性,量表测评的实施过程尚不够规范等问题有待完善。有必要加强遵循中医理论,按照国际通用的量表研制规范开展相关研究,以推动量表测评方法在中医药疗效中应用的规范化发展。 The assessing contents of the health related quality of life (HRQOL) and the patient reported outcomes (PRO) are identical with the inquiry of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which are uniformly soft indicators which could be evaluated with the scales for instruments. The assessing method for the soft indicator in the HRQOL and PRO was gradually accepted by TCM practitioners and applied in evaluating the curative effect of TCM. The applying scale in the assessment of curative effect of TCM and the developing scale with the TCM features just started in the TCM field. There was much inadequacy in the scale study, such as no penetrating understanding of the theory and connotation of the scale in the HRQOL and PRO, on scale system for TCM, no direction in selecting scale, not standardizing in the design of the study with scale in the practice. So, it is necessary that the international guideline of developing scale applied for worldwide should be carried out in the study for developing scale. Meanwhile, it must also be under the guidance of TCM theory in the whole course. It will promote the normalization development of applying scale in the assessment of curative effect in the TCM practice.
作者 刘凤斌
出处 《中国中西医结合杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第12期1129-1132,共4页 Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
关键词 量表 中医药 疗效评价 scale traditional Chinese medicine therapeutic efficacy evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Life 1993 ; 2 : 441-449. 被引量:1
  • 2Patrick DL. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) : an organizing tool for concepts, measures and applications. Qual Life Newsletter 2003 ; 31 : 1-5. 被引量:1
  • 3Hunt SM, Mckznna SP, Mcewen J, et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: validation of a health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15:221-229. 被引量:1
  • 4Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Pollard WE, et al. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976 ; 14 : 57-67. 被引量:1
  • 5Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Aldalla MI, et al, The SF-36 Health survey questionnaire: An outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. BMJ 1993;306(6890):1440-1444. 被引量:1
  • 6WHO, The 100 questions with response scales: WHOQOL 100, 1995, WHO, Geneva. 被引量:1
  • 7WHOQOL-Measuring Quality of Life. MSA/MNH/PSF, WHO, Geneva, 1997:4. 被引量:1
  • 8The EuroQol Group, EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 9(6) : P199-208. 被引量:1
  • 9Bonomi AE, Cella DF. A cross-cultural adaptation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system for use in European ontology clinical trials. Qual Life Newsletter 1995 ; ( 12 ) : 5-7. 被引量:1
  • 10Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: attributes and review. Qual Life Res 2002 ; 11 : 193-205. 被引量:1

二级参考文献87

共引文献793

同被引文献455

引证文献32

二级引证文献341

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部