期刊文献+

从转喻场境到语用参数和言外ICM 被引量:18

From Metonymic Scenario to Pragmatic Parameters and Illocutionary ICM
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在分析Panther和Thornburg转喻场境推理模式优缺点的基础上提出把语用参数有机地融入该模式中去,使转喻场境变成涵盖范围更大的言外ICM.本文认为这种范围更广的言外ICM具有更强的解释力,可以更有效地区分一些具有细微差别的间接言语行为。本文运用言外ICM中的语用参数对汉语中关于威胁、乞求、恳求和命令等言语行为进行详细地分析、阐释和区分,试图找出这些言语行为之间的异同。笔者认为,对言外ICM研究可以进一步拓展认知语言学对场境和转喻语用推理模式的研究范围。 Based upon the analysis of advantages and disadvantages of pragmatic inferencing model of metonymic scenario in Cognitive Linguistics, the paper proposes that pragmatic parameters should be incorporated into metonymic scenario, making it a wider and more comprehensive illocutionary ICM. The paper points out that such an illocutionary ICM has more explanatory power and can more effectively distinguish some subtle types of indirect speech acts. Threatening, pegging, request and order in Chinese, etc. are analysed and distinguished with pragmatic parameters within an illocutionary ICM. The paper believes that the research into illocutionary ICM expands the studies of metonymic scenario and pragmatic inferencing in Cognitive Linguistics.
作者 张辉
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期32-38,共7页 Foreign Language Research
基金 国家社科基金"汉语熟语理解的神经机制研究"(06BYY019)的阶段性成果之
关键词 言外ICM 语用参数 言语行为 转喻场境 illocutionary ICM pragmatic parameters speech acts metonymic scenario metonymy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1张辉,周平.转喻与语用推理图式[J].外国语,2002,25(4):46-52. 被引量:54
  • 2张辉 ,孙明智 .概念转喻的本质、分类和认知运作机制[J].外语与外语教学,2005(3):1-6. 被引量:147
  • 3Gibbs,R.W.The Poetics of Mind:Figurative Thought,Language and Understanding[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1994. 被引量:1
  • 4Grice,P.Studies in the Way of Words[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1989. 被引量:1
  • 5Panther,K-W & Thornburg,L.A Cognitive Approach to Inferencing in Conversation[J].Journal of Pragmatics,1998(30). 被引量:1
  • 6Perez Hernandez L.& F.Ruiz de Mendoza.Grounding,Semantic Motivation and Conceptual Interaction in Indirect Speech Acts[J].Journal of Pragmatics,2002 (34). 被引量:1
  • 7Perez Hernandez,L.The ICMs of Requesting[A].In Proceedings of the XXI AEDEAN International Congress,Seville[C].1999. 被引量:1
  • 8Perez Hernandez,L.The Speech Act Categories[J].Journal of English Studies.2004(19). 被引量:1
  • 9Ruiz de Mendoza,F.L.Linguistic Interpretation and Cognition[A].In Elena Croitoru,Daniel Tuchel and Michaela Praisler (eds.).Cultural Matrix Reloaded.The 7th International RSEAS Conference[C].Bucarest:Didactica Si Pedagogica,2006. 被引量:1
  • 10Ruiz de Mendoza,F.J.& A.Baicchi.Illocutionary Constructions:Cognitive Motivation and Linguistic Realization[A].A paper presented at the Ninth International Conference of Cognitive Linguistics[C].Seoul.South Korea,2005. 被引量:1

二级参考文献30

  • 1张辉.认知语义学述评[J].外语与外语教学,1999(12):4-8. 被引量:35
  • 2张辉,周平.转喻与语用推理图式[J].外国语,2002,25(4):46-52. 被引量:54
  • 3Alac, M. and S. Coulson The Man, the Key, or the Car: Who or What Is Parked Out Back? [J]. Cognitive Science Online, 2004.Vol.2. 21-34. 被引量:1
  • 4Barcelona, A. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000b. 被引量:1
  • 5Dirven, R. Metonymy and Metaphor: Different Mental Strategies of Conceptualization[J]. Leuvense Bijdragen ,1993.8-2: 1-25. 被引量:1
  • 6Dirven, R. and R. Poring (eds.) Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast[C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 被引量:1
  • 7Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. The Way We Think: The Man's Hidden Complexities and Conceptual Blending[M]. New York: Basic Books,2002. 被引量:1
  • 8Goossens, L. Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Actions [J]. Cognitive Linguistics,1990:1-3: 323-340. 被引量:1
  • 9Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980. 被引量:1
  • 10Lakoff, G. & M. Turner. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor[M]. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press,1989. 被引量:1

共引文献188

同被引文献179

引证文献18

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部