摘要
采用法社会学的方法探讨了中国古代水权纠纷的民事审判,为构建我国水权纠纷解决机制提供历史借鉴。中国古代水权纠纷审判分两种方式,即水权纠纷民事审判和附属刑案的水权纠纷审判,前者依据普通民事审判的程序审理,州县衙门是审判的主要承担者;在法律适用方面,习惯法扮演着重要的角色。附属于刑案的水权纠纷审判,以刑事审理为主,民事部分只是刑事部分的附属,不具有重要地位。无论是前者,还是后者,判决的执行分实体执行与非实体执行,其中非实体执行更为重要。
Applying the method of sociological law, this paper discusses the justice of water-fight disputes in modem China, which include civil justice and justice pertaining to criminal trial. Of the two kinds, the former cases were judged by ordinary civil procedure and the latter were done by the procedure of criminal trial. The officials of counties and stages judged most cases of water-fight disputes. When the officials judged the cases, they used customs and local statutes. As for the enforcement of verdict, it includes the enforcement of substantiality and non-substantiality. The enforcement of non-substantiality is more important than that of substantiality.
出处
《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期72-77,共6页
Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
司法部专项基金项目(05SFB5004)
关键词
水权
审判
法律
习惯法
Water rights
justice
law
custom
