摘要
钱钟书先生《通感》一文发表后影响巨大。然而以“通感”译Synaesthesia，使中国固有的“心感”埋没，被视为舶来品，造成传统诗学资源流失。经研究可知，心感论是中国诗学对世界学术的一大贡献，应该为“心感”正名，请“心感”归位。“心感”和“通感”仅一字之差，但绝非一字之争，关乎传统学术的保护，应当引起重视。
Tong Gan（Synaesthesia）, an essay written by Qian Zhongshu has exerted great influences upon critics after its publication, however, the English translation of this term as ＂Synaesthesia＂ has undermined the concept of ＂Xin gan＂ （ sensation）, one of the key terms of the Chinese traditional poetics. In consequence, this longstanding Chinese concept has been mistaken as a borrowed term from the Western criticism, and resulted in the loss of Chinese poetics heritage. The related studies show that the notion of ＂Xingan＂ has made a great contribution to poetics wordwide, and it must reclaim its own significant position. ＂Tong gan＂ and ＂Xingan＂ seem to differ in just one Chinese character, yet it matters greatly insofar as about the protection of Chinese critical tradition, to which we should pay great heed and attach great importance.
出处
《中国比较文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第4期63-71,共9页
Comparative Literature in China
关键词
通感
心感
传统学术
遗产保护
Tong gan
Xingan
traditional poetics
the protection of heritage
