摘要
目的:在对自我调节及其与自我调节相关的概念进行介绍的基础上,分析自我调节过程,并从集体主义和个人主义视角下比较自我调节在目标选择和实现,行为决定因素方面的文化差异,分析中国文化下自我调节的特点。资料来源:应用计算机检索ProQuest数据库(PsychologyJournals)1995-01/2005-08和CNKI数据库1994-01/2006-02中与自我调节相关的书籍和文献,检索词英文“self-regulation”,中文“自我调节”。资料选择:从资料中选取对自我调节跨文化研究进行分析的有关文献。纳入标准:①包括实验研究文章和综述文章。②自我调节行为的相关跨文化研究和著作。排除标准:①两个数据库的重复文献。②文献中的重复研究。资料提炼:共收集到128篇关于自我调节行为的英文文章,排除了重复文献、重复研究以及非跨文化研究的文章后,有16篇文献纳入标准。其中中文文献5篇,英文文献11篇。资料综合:西欧和北美等西方国家的文化是典型的个体主义文化代表,而亚洲的日本、印度和中国等东方国家的文化则是典型的集体主义文化代表。17篇文章分别从行为特点、思维方式、家庭教养方式、学习心理和学习特点等方面比较了自我调节的文化差异。结论:中国传统文化强调社会取向而忽视个人的价值,尊严与权利,由此也产生了种种弊病。在进行跨文化研究时,不仅要从宏观层面去对文化模式进行划分,同时个体之间的人格差异也不可忽视,应该全面地考虑到多种可能,才能够对研究结果做出满意的解释。
OBJECTIVE： To analyze the process of self-regulation based on the introduction of self-regulation and relevant concepts about it, and compare the cultural differences in objective selection, realization and determinant factors of self-regulation from collectivism and individualism perspective as well as analyze the characters of self-regulation under Chinese culture. DATA SOURCES： A computer-based search of books and papers about self-regulation between January 1995 and August 2005 was conducted in ProQuest Database （Psychology Journals） and CNKI Database between January 1994 and February 2006 with the key words of ＂self-regulation＂. STUDY SELECTION： The literatures on self-regulation of cross-culture were selected. The inclusive criteria：①Reviews and experimental studies. ②The cross-cultural correlative studies of self-regulation. The exclusive criteria： ①Repetitive studies in two databases. ②Repetitive researches in literatures. DATA EXTRACTION： A total of 128 English papers about self-regulation were collected, and repeated studies, papers and the papers of non-cross cultural were excluded. Sixteen literatures were in accordance with the inelusive criteria, in which 5 were Chinese literatures and 11 were English literatures. DATA SYNTHESIS： Culture of western Europe and North American are of typical individualism, while those of Japan, Indian and China in Asian are of typical collectivism. The cultural differences of self-regulation were compared in 17 papers respectively from aspects of behavioral traits, thinking method, rearing style, learning psychology and learning characters. CONCLUSION： In Chinese traditional culture, the social orientation is emphasized, whereas personal value, dignity and right are neglected, and thus resulting in all sorts of diseases. Researches on cross-culture should not only be divided from the macroscopic view, the differences in personality among individuals should also be noticed, comprehensively considering to many kinds of possibility, only th
出处
《中国临床康复》
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第26期123-125,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation
