摘要
本文在归纳国际学术界流行的有关“全球史”与“世界史”不同观点的基础上,根据词源语义、历史背景以及“世界史”与“全球史”研究成果的不同特征,辨析二者在研究对象、观察视角、研究方法以及治史观念上的异同。本文认为,“全球史”与“世界史”虽有联系,但是也有明显差异,二者不能等同视之。从学科发展的角度来看,“全球史”可以界定为历史学门类下一个正在形成中的新的学科分支。
This article focuses on the differences between World history and Global history. After comparing the two items by etymology of the words, their historical backgrounds and their outcomes of research, it is clear that their similarities are less than their differences. This can be seen in their object of study, standpoints of investigation, methods of research, concepts of historical research and so on. The author points out that Global History shouldn＇ t be seen the same as World History. On the contrary, from the point of view of the development of the disciplines, Global History should be seen as a new branch of historiography.
出处
《首都师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第3期1-5,共5页
Journal of Capital Normal University：Social Science Edition
关键词
全球史
世界史
历史学
world history, global history, historiography
