期刊文献+

自我评价绩效的因果模型与动态属性 被引量:4

原文传递
导出
摘要 本文着眼于求解不同绩效评价方法下的评价结果差异,探讨了自我评价绩效的因果模型及其在时间维度上的动态属性。实证分析结果显示,自我评价绩效与上级评价绩效之所以经常存在显著的差异,很大程度上是由于自我评价绩效的因果模型具有独特性;在上级评价的因果模型中,评价者通常根据被评价者的业务熟练程度和工作知识水平作出绩效评价,而在自我评价的因果模型中,评价者通常会根据自身的资历和业务熟练情况作出绩效评价;评价依据上的差异导致了不同绩效评估方法下得分的迴异。随后,将样本在担任现职的时间维度上分组进行比较后发现,管理者在自我评价绩效过程中的评价标准上存在动态变化的特征。最后,对研究结论的理论意义和有待进一步研究的方向进行了讨论。
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期97-105,共9页 Journal of Management World
基金 中国博士后科学基金(2005038627) 国家自然科学基金项目(70302011)资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J.,1997, "Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research", Human Performance, 10(2), pp.99~109. 被引量:1
  • 2Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L M, & Levy, P. E., 1998, "Participation in the Performance Appraisal Process and Employee Reactions: A Meta-analytie Review of Field Investigations",Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4): pp.615~633. 被引量:1
  • 3Conway, J. M., 1996. "Additional Construct Validity Evidence for the Task Contextual Performance Distinction", Human Performance, 9(4): pp.309~329. 被引量:1
  • 4Deadrick, D. L., Bennett, N, & Russell, C. J., 1997,"Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling to Examine Dynamic Performance Criteria Over Time", Journal of Management, 23 (6):pp.745-757. 被引量:1
  • 5Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J., 2002,"Understanding Self-report bias in Organizational Behavior Research",Journal of Business and Psychology,17(2): pp.245~260. 被引量:1
  • 6Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J.,1988, "A Meta-analysis of Self-supervisor, Self-peer and Peer-supervisor Ratings",Personnel Psychology, 41 ( 1 ): pp.43-59. 被引量:1
  • 7Hoffman, C. C., Nathan, B R, & Holden, L. M.,1991, "A Comparison of Validation Criteria - objective Versus Subjective Performance Measures and Self-Versus Supervisor Ratings",Personnel Psychology, 44(3 )" pp.601 ~619. 被引量:1
  • 8Hu, L. H., & Bentler, P. M.,1998, "Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspeeification', Psychological Methods, 3 (3): pp.424~453. 被引量:1
  • 9Hunter, J. E.,1983, "A Causal Analysis of Cognitive Ability, Job Knowledge, Job Performance, and Supervisory Ratings", In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland, Performance Measurement and Theory, Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, pp.257~266. 被引量:1
  • 10Inderrieden, E. J, Allen, R. E, & Keaveny, T J., 2004,"Managerial Discretion in the Use of Self-ratings in an Appraisal System: The Antecedents and Consequences", Journal of Managerial Issues, 16(4): pp.460~482. 被引量:1

同被引文献58

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部