摘要
目的评价付出-获得不平衡(ERI)量表中文版的信度和效度。方法采用中文版ERI量表对4782名不同职业人群进行工作压力的横断面调查,量表包括付出、获得和超负荷三部分23个条目。运用可靠性分析来评价ERI量表的信度,运用因子分析方法来评价ERI量表的结构效度。结果研究中获取的调查数据支持付出-获得不平衡模式的理论假设;中文版ERI量表中付出和获得子量表的信度和效度均较高,但是超负荷子量表的信度和效度均不高。结论ERI量表中付出、获得子量表可以直接应用于中国人群的调查,但是超负荷子量表中条目不能直接用于中国人群的调查。
Objective To evaluate reliability and validity of the effort-reward imbalance（ERI） in the Chinese version. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted comprising a large sample of 4782 subjects in China, using ERI in the Chinese version. This scale contained 23 scaled items while the questionnaire including questions on the effort and reward at work,over-commitment, the full CES-D scale of depression and a range of other characteristics. Reliability analysis was applied to evaluate reliability of the ERI scale in the Chinese version and factor analysis was applied to analyze validity of the scale. Results Theoretical hypothesis on the ERI model was supported by the data derived in this study. Reliability and validity of the effort sub-scale, the reward sub-scale of the ERI scale in the Chinese version seemed to be better,but reliability and validity of the over-commitment sub-scale were not perfect. Conclusion The results of the study showed that the effort sub-scale,the reward sub-scale of the ERI in the Chinese version was applicable to the Chinese population but the scaled items of the over-commitment sub-scale should be further modified.
出处
《中华流行病学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第1期25-28,共4页
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
关键词
付出-获得不平衡
量表
信度
效度
Effort-reward imbalance
Scale
Reliability
Validity
