摘要
论题指出,“公平责任”实际上是在用道德上的要求取代法律上的请求,这混淆了法律义务和道德义务间的重要区别。这种取代反映的是分配正义的观念,其极端化将导向全权国家的思想。提议应当坚持弗里德里希.卡尔.冯.萨维尼和弗里德利希.冯.哈耶克所主张的“视法律为自由之基础的法律观”,即个人正义的法律观。
Up to date, the theory of ＂fair liability＂ has been both influential and controversial in the field of Chinese tort law. This article ventures to make a critical review of the issue, arguing that ＂fair liability＂ is meant to substitute a legal claim with a moral claim, which will mix up the important difference between moral and law. Such a substitution simply reflects the idea of distributive justice, whose extreme form will lead to the idea of an omnipotent state. In this light, the author strongly recommends the doctrine of Friedrich Carl v. Savigny and F. A. Hayek, known as the ＂Legal Idea of Individual Justice＂, which takes law as the foundation of liberty.
出处
《海南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2005年第4期395-400,共6页
Journal of Hainan University （Humanities & Social Sciences）
关键词
公平责任
侵权责任
责任
fair liability
tortuous liability
liability
