摘要
我国民法典侵权责任编草案二审稿第954-1条增加了自担风险规则,在保护民事权益与维护行为自由之间的平衡具有重要的现实意义。但是,自担风险规则的发展,使其并非简单作为一种免责事由,应协调过失相抵规则,在特殊情形下作为减轻责任事由。此外,在活动组织者责任中,应确定组织者在未违反安全保障义务、教育责任情形下,自担风险的适用。
Article 954-1 of the second draft of the Civil Code’s Tort Liability adds the rule of assumption of risk.It has important practical significance in the balance of protection of civil rights and maintain freedom of conduct.However,the developing of assumption of risk,it should be applied to comparative negligence rule to be diminished liability and not simply regarded as a valid reason to be exemption from liabilities.Additionally,regarding the responsibility of organizers in such activities,it is also necessary to determine that the organizer doesn’t violate the security guarantee obligation and the education responsibility,and should be exemption of liabilities by applied to assumption of risk.
作者
相博达
李倩
XIANG Bo-da;LI Qian(Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan,Hunan,411000)
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2020年第1期47-55,共9页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基金
2018年湖南省研究生科研创新项目“我国法院裁判运动伤害案件的最新立场及趋势研究”(CX2018B695)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“高危性体育活动中特殊旧制度的比较研究”(14YJCZH0792014).
关键词
自担风险
公平分担损失
免责事由
assumption of risk
fair share loss
exemption from liabilities
