摘要
通过对学术期刊几种审稿方式:专家审稿和编辑审稿,匿名审稿和公开审稿,个体审稿和多人审稿的优劣对比分析,指出采用不同审稿方式应注意的问题,以便在审稿实践中灵活运用审稿方式。
This paper makes contrasts between review patterns of academic journals, namely, the contrasts between specialist review and editor review, dual anonymous review and public review, and individual review and multiple review. The aim is to point out what attention should be paid to different review patterns for the purpose of the free use of them.
出处
《江汉大学学报（社会科学版）》
2004年第4期35-38,共4页
Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
审稿方式
学术期刊
专家审稿
编辑
灵活运用
实践
个体
对比分析
问题
公开
academic journal
specialist review
editor review
anonymous review
public review
individual review
multiple review
