期刊文献+

闭合论不是重言式——当代西方知识论对怀疑主义的重要论证方式的批判 被引量:2

The Closure Theory of Knowledge Is Not Tautology:Criticism of Contemporary Western Epistemology on the Important Mode of Skeptical Argument
下载PDF
导出
摘要 闭合论是怀疑主义的重要论证方式。人们通常认为 ,闭合论是重言式。德雷兹克以排除所有相关选择项作为知识定义的必要条件 ,主张怀疑主义假设不是相关选择项 ,闭合论必须限制在相关选择的语境范围内。诺齐克的知识条件论主张 ,知识就是追踪真理的信念 ,知识的本性是非闭合的。闭合论会导出绝对无谬论 ,绝对无谬论是错误的。当代西方知识论对闭合论是重言式的批判 。 Closure theory is an important argument form of skepticism. People usually think that closure theory is tautology. Fred Dretske claims that eliminating all of relevant alternatives is the necessary condition for the definition of knowledge, and that skeptical suppositions are not relevant alternatives, so the closure theory must be restricted in the contextual area of relevant alternatives. According to Robert Nozick's conditional theory of knowledge, the nature of knowledge is not in a closed form. Closure theory will result in infallibilism, which proves to be wrong. Therefore, the criticism on closure theory of knowledge being tautology is also a criticism on skepticism.
作者 曹剑波
机构地区 厦门大学哲学系
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第6期21-28,共8页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目 ( 0 2BZX0 42 )
关键词 闭合论 怀疑主义 相关选择论 知识条件论 绝对无谬论 the closure theory, skepticism,the theory of relevant alternatives, the conditional theory of knowledge, infallibilism
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1IMMANUE KANT.Critic of Pure Reason[M].London:Macmillan,1958. 被引量:1
  • 2W.V.QUINE.Ontological Relativity and Other Essays[M].New York:Columbia University Press,1969. 被引量:1
  • 3JONATHAN DANCY.An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology[M].Oxford:Basil Blackwell Ltd,1985. 被引量:1
  • 4FRED DRETSKE.Epistemic Operators[A].in KEITH DEROSE & TED A.WARFILD (eds.).Skepticism:A Contemporary Reader[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1999. 被引量:1
  • 5MICHAEL WILLIAMS.Scepticism[M].Aldershot:Dartmouth Publishing House,1993. 被引量:1
  • 6ROBERT NOZICK.Philosophical Explanations[A].in KEITH DEROSE & TED A.WARFILD (eds.).Skepticism:A Contemporary Reader[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1999. 被引量:1
  • 7FRED DRETSKE.The Pragmatic Dimension of Knowledge[A].in FRED DRETSKE.Perception,Knowledge and Belief:Selected Essays[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2000. 被引量:1
  • 8ALVIN GOLDMAN.Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge[J].The Journal of Philosophy,1976(20). 被引量:1
  • 9GAIL STINE.Skepticism,Relevant Alternatives,and Deductive Closure[A].in KEITH DEROSE & TED A.WARFILD (eds.).Skepticism:A Contemporary Reader[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1999. 被引量:1
  • 10MICHAEL WILLAMS.Nozick on knowledge and skepticism[A].in David Schmidtz (ed.).Robert Nozick[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,(2002). 被引量:1

同被引文献48

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部