期刊文献+

QUADAS-2在诊断准确性研究的质量评价工具中的应用 被引量:104

The QUADAS-2 Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study:an Introduction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 诊断准确性研究的质量评价工具QUADAS(Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies)自2003年正式推出以来,就得到了广泛的应用。在实践过程中,一些个人经验、零星报道及各种反馈都提出了该工具在使用过程中需要进行改进的一些问题。因此,为了进一步完善该工具,研发小组对QUADAS进行了修订,并于2011年推出了QUADAS-2。相比QUADAS,QUADAS-2将一些易混淆的条目内容进行了删除和完善,将评价的条目改为单独评价的偏倚风险和临床适用性两个方面,并增加了标志性问题进行辅助判断。目前,QUADAS-2已经被加入到Rev-Man 5.2软件中。本文对QUADAS-2进行介绍,并以实例展示了在RevMan 5.2软件中的使用。 Since the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies(QUADAS) tool was officially launched for assessing the quality of diagnosis accuracy study in 2003,it has been widely used all over the world.In practice,some experiences,reports,feedbacks from users or academic organizations suggested the potential for improving this tool.Therefore,in order to improve this tool,the QUADAS Group revised it and then launched QUADAS-2 in 2011.Compared with QUADAS,QUADAS-2 deleted and improved some items which were easily confused,divided the assessment items into the risk of bias and the applicability,and provided signaling questions which could help judgment.Currently,QUADAS-2 has been integrated to RevMan 5.2 software.This article makes a briefly introduction of QUADAS-2 and show how we use it in RevMan 5.2 software.
出处 《湖北医药学院学报》 CAS 2013年第3期201-208,共8页 Journal of Hubei University of Medicine
基金 湖北省教育科学"十二五"规划2012年度重点课题(2012A050) 湖北医药学院2011年度优秀中青年科技创新团队项目(2011CZX01) 湖北医药学院2010年度教学研究项目(2010017)
关键词 QUADAS QUADAS-2 RevMan5.2软件 诊断准确性研究 系统评价 META分析 QUADAS QUADAS-2 RevMan 5.2 software Diagnostic accuracy study Systematic review Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1曾宪涛,李胜,雷晋,郭毅.Review Manager 5软件在诊断准确性试验的Meta分析中的应用[J].湖北医药学院学报,2013,32(1):6-16. 被引量:32
  • 2曾宪涛,庄丽萍,杨宗国,董圣杰.Meta分析系列之七:非随机实验性研究、诊断性试验及动物实验的质量评价工具[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志,2012,4(6):496-499. 被引量:98
  • 3Whiting P,Rutjes AWS,Reitsma JB,et al.The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[].BMC Medical Research Methodology.2003 被引量:1
  • 4Deeks JJ,Bossuyt PM,Gatsonis C.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version1.0.0. http://srdta.cochrane.org . 2009 被引量:1
  • 5Whiting PF,Rutjes AW,Westwood ME,et al.QUADAS-2:a re-vised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies[].Annals of Internal Medicine.2011 被引量:1
  • 6.Review Manager (RevMan)[Computer program].Version 5.2[].Journal of Women s Health.2012 被引量:1
  • 7Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Dinnes J,et al.Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies[].Health Technology Assessment Reports.2004 被引量:1
  • 8D Moher,KF Schulz,I Simera,DG Altman.Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines[].PLoS Med.2010 被引量:1
  • 9Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al.Sources of variation andbias in studies of diagnostic accuracy:a systematic review[].Annals of Internal Medicine.2004 被引量:1
  • 10Zhang Y,Huang J,Chen M,Jiao LR.Preoperative vascular evaluation with computed tomography and magnetic reso- nance imaging for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis[].Pancre- atology.2012 被引量:1

二级参考文献27

  • 1Slim K,Nini E,Forestier D,et al. Methodological index for non- randomized studies(minors):development and validation of a new instrument[J]. ANZ J Surg,2003,73(9):712-6. 被引量:1
  • 2Reisch JS,Tyson JE,Mize SG. Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies[J]. Pediatrics,1989,84(5):815-27. 被引量:1
  • 3Des Jarlais DC,Lyles C,Crepaz N,TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions:the TREND statement[J]. Am J Public Health,2004,94(3):361-6. 被引量:1
  • 4Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al. The development of QUADAS:a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2003,3:25. 被引量:1
  • 5Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Dinnes J,et al. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies[J]. Health Technol Assess,2004,8(25):iii,1-234. 被引量:1
  • 6Higgins JPT,Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration,2011[J]. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. 被引量:1
  • 7Deeks JJ,Bossuyt PM,Gatsonis C. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration,2009[J]. http://srdta.cochrmle.org. 被引量:1
  • 8CASP(Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)[EB/OL]. [2012-10-01]. http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-contenffuploads/2011 / 11/C ASP_Diagno stic Appraisal_Checklist_14oct 10.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 9Bossuyt PM,Reitsma JB,Bruns DE,et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration [J]. Ann Intern ned,2003,138(1):W1-12. 被引量:1
  • 10Stroke therapy academic industry roundtable(Fisher M,Chair). Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development [J]. Stroke,1999,30(12):2752-8. 被引量:1

共引文献127

同被引文献1154

引证文献104

二级引证文献700

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部