摘要
传统的把法律关系客体表述为"物、行为结果、精神财富、人身利益标的、环境和国家利益标的"的理论,存在论证理由不够充分、无法很好地实现对其他部门法学的理论指导的问题。在"权利客体"的标准下把法律关系客体抽象为"行为"是较好的选择,主要理由是:行为是法律的调整对象,行为抽象产生权利和义务,行为是权利和义务指向的对象,行为是准确把握权利和义务的内涵和外延的关键。
There is no enough reason consider the object of juristic relationship as "things, result of act, immaterial wealth, personal interests, environmental and state interests",and that theory cannot offer academic guidance for the other branches of legal science. Standard established by "the object of right" the better choice is "act" as the object of juristic relationship, the reason include the following: law adjust the act, give an abstract of act the legal right and obligation come into being, act is the ob...
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第5期121-126,共6页
Legal Forum
关键词
法律关系
客体
行为
juristic relationship
object
act
