摘要
由于香港法律与英国法律的渊源关系,英国对于传闻证据规则的修改成为香港法律修订的原因之一。就传闻证据规则而言,香港法律中只对民事法律程序中的该规则做出了重大修改,但刑事法律程序中的传闻证据规则被沿袭下来,仍然较为严格。澳门法律中与传闻证据相类似的规定更接近于大陆法系国家的直接言词原则。此外,澳门刑事诉讼法中关于供未来备忘用之声明制度颇具特色。台湾在2003年修改"刑事诉讼法"时对传闻证据规则做出了规定,但台湾学者对于是否应当采纳传闻证据规则以及现行法律规定的评价和争论令人印象深刻。
Owing to the relationship between laws of Hong Kong and British legal history, the modification of British Hearsay Rule is one of the reasons for Hong Kong to amend its law. For the Hearsay Rule, only the civil proceedings of Hong Kong law have been revised greatly while the Hearsay Rule in criminal proceedings is inherited and is still relatively stringent. In Macao law provisions similar to the Hearsay Rule is closer to the Principle of Direct Trial and Verbal of civil law system. In addition, the statement for future memos system of Macao Criminal Procedure Law is full of distinctive features. Taiwan stipulated the Hearsay Rule while modifying the criminal procedure law in 2003, but the evaluation and dispute between Taiwan scholars on existing law and whether the Hearsay Rule should be adopted are impressive. The legislation of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan on the Hearsay Rule and similar provisions is of self-evident referential significance for related legislation in China's Mainland.
出处
《证据科学》
2007年第5期128-144,共17页
Evidence Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目成果(06JA820043)
关键词
传闻
传闻证据
传闻证据规则
证人
Hearsay, Hearsay evidence, Hearsay rule, Witness
